Republicans criticize report on right-wing groups
By EILEEN SULLIVAN
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Republicans on Wednesday said a Homeland Security Department intelligence assessment unfairly characterizes military veterans as right-wing extremists. House Republican leader John Boehner described the report as offensive and called on the agency to apologize to veterans.
The agency's intelligence assessment, sent to law enforcement officials last week, warns that right-wing extremists could use the bad state of the U.S. economy and the election of the country's first black president to recruit members.
The assessment also said that returning military veterans who have difficulties assimilating back into their home communities could be susceptible to extremist recruiters or might engage in lone acts of violence.
"To characterize men and women returning home after defending our country as potential terrorists is offensive and unacceptable," said Boehner, R-Ohio.
The commander of the veterans group the American Legion, David Rehbein, wrote to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano expressing concern with the assessment, which made its way into the mainstream press after conservative bloggers got wind of the analysis.
Rehbein called the assessment incomplete and said it lacked statistical evidence. He said the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing by military veteran Timothy McVeigh was one instance of a veteran becoming a domestic terrorist.
"To continue to use McVeigh as an example of the stereotypical 'disgruntled military veteran' is as unfair as using Osama bin Laden as the sole example of Islam," Rehbein said in the April 13 letter.
Napolitano defended the assessment and others issued by the agency.
"Let me be very clear - we monitor the risks of violent extremism taking root here in the United States," Napolitano said in a statement. "We don't have the luxury of focusing our efforts on one group; we must protect the country from terrorism whether foreign or homegrown, and regardless of the ideology that motivates its violence."
Napolitano said the department respects and honors veterans and that she intends to meet with Rehbein next week after she returns from a tour of the U.S.-Mexico border and meetings in Mexico City.
The agency describes these assessments as part of a series published "to facilitate a greater understanding of the phenomenon of violent radicalization in the United States."
In February, the department issued a report to law enforcement that said left-wing extremist groups were likely to use cyber attacks more often in the next 10 years to further their cause.
In September, the agency highlighted how right-wing extremists over the past five years have used the immigration debate as a recruiting tool.
Between September 2008 and Feb. 5, the agency issued at least four reports, obtained by The Associated Press, on individual extremist groups such as the Moors, Vinlanders Social Club, Volksfront and Hammerskin Nation.
But the references to military veterans in the recent report angered conservatives.
"The department is engaging in political and ideological profiling of people who fought to keep our country safe from terrorism, uphold our nation's immigration laws, and protect our constitutional right to keep and bear arms," said Rep. Gus Bilirakis, R-Fla.,
Texas Rep. Lamar Smith accused the department of painting "law-abiding Americans, including war veterans, as 'extremists.'"
Indiana Rep. Steve Buyer, the ranking Republican on the House Veterans' Affairs committee, said it was "inconceivable" that the administration would consider military veterans a potential terrorist threat.
Alexander Wang
What's "inconceivable" is that these guys are pretending that the old Homeland Security under Bush wasn't using profiling... Laughable.
1OT - since I don't know how to start a new thread yet ... haven't used private groups much sorry...
But If I may, can I offer a suggestion - TS why don't you (I'm thinking you're mostly a lefty), someone that is on the right (maybe Cabaker..or is it Haus now) and a middle of the roader (Mich) become like the new "old CitizenSugar" girls - rather than this be just another group like Liberal/Conservative sugar and honestly as much as people complained about the stupid stuff on CS from time to time - I liked the fluff news - that's why I came here and not CSPAN.Net or some other hardcore news site - I liked the real news with a side of fluff and fun.
...ok suggestion over. Thanks.
Sorry for not knowing how to post this somewhere else.
2zeze, that's an interesting idea! I'd be in favor of it.
3I think this speaks for itself:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/?p=18062
Double Standard
Can you imagine the howls of outrage from all of the nation’s editorial pages, and the heads exploding on MSNBC, if the Bush administration DHS had put out a document that said things like this?
(U) Leftwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular economic classes, and religious groups, particularly Christianity), and those that are mainly pro-government, preferring federal authority and particularly federal judicial rulings over state or local authority. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to restrictions on abortion, immigration, or gay marriage.
(U//LES) Leftwing extremists are harnessing this historical election as a recruitment tool. Many leftwing extremists are antagonistic toward the Bush administration and its perceived stance on a range of issues, including treatment of prisoners in Guantamo and its Iraq policy, restricting affirmative action to minorities, and funding restrictions on abortions overseas and embryonic stem-cell research. Leftwing extremists are increasingly galvanized by these concerns and leverage them as drivers for recruitment. From the 2004 election timeframe to the present, leftwing extremists have capitalized on related racial and political prejudices in expanded propaganda campaigns, thereby reaching out to a wider audience of potential sympathizers.
(U) Exploiting Unhappiness With Iraq
(U//FOUO) Leftwing extremist chatter on the Internet continues to focus on the Iraqi death toll, the perceived loss of civil rights and restrictions on abortion rights. Anti-Semitic extremists attribute these losses to a deliberate conspiracy conducted by a cabal of Jewish “financial elites” favoring Israel. These “accusatory” tactics are employed to draw new recruits into leftwing extremist groups and further radicalize those already subscribing to extremist beliefs. DHS/I&A assesses this trend is likely to accelerate if the war situation is perceived to worsen.
(U//FOUO) Over the past several years, various leftwing extremists, including socialist groups such as International A.N.S.W.E.R and Hispanic supremacists such as La Raza, have adopted the immigration issue as a call to action, rallying point, and recruiting tool. Debates over appropriate immigration levels and enforcement policy generally fall within the realm of protected political speech under the First Amendment, but in some cases, pro-immigration or strident anti-enforcement fervor has been directed against specific groups and has the potential to turn violent.
(U) Disgruntled Military Veterans
(U//FOUO) DHS/I&A assesses that leftwing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in order to exploit their skills and knowledge derived from military training and combat. These skills and knowledge have the potential to boost the capabilities of extremists—including lone wolves or small terrorist cells—to carry out violence. The willingness of a small percentage of military personnel to join extremist groups during the 1990s because they were disgruntled, disillusioned, or suffering from the psychological effects of war is being replicated today.
(U//FOUO) DHS/I&A will be working with its state and local partners over the next several months to ascertain with greater regional specificity the rise in leftwing extremist activity in the United States, with a particular emphasis on the political, economic, and social factors that drive leftwing extremist radicalization.
4"The assessment also said that returning military veterans who have difficulties assimilating back into their home communities could be susceptible to extremist recruiters or might engage in lone acts of violence."
To pretend otherwise is sticking our heads in the sand.
5Last fall, DHS under Bush said right wing extremists were using the illegal immigration debate as a recruiting tool. Under Obama, DHS said left wing extremists might resort to cyber terrorism. They're just sayin' is all...
also from the above listed site:
Imagine, if you will, what the Left would say if we took this entire document and replaced all references to “military veterans” with “Muslims”, and all references to “abortion” with “universal health care”, and then predated this DHS report to 2008, during the Bush administration. They’d be screaming about being smeared as traitors for their political beliefs, and they’d be right to do so. That’s exactly what the Obama administration and Janet Napolitano has done here.
6Steph, I have the honor of knowing a few dozen Iraqi vets, and a number of parents of vets. one of those Iraqi soldiers who I was corresponding with on line was killed trying to get 3 insurgents to surrender, rather then see them killed. The mother of two of my grandchildren is at this moment is serving somewhere in Afghanistan. I have yet to personally know, or know anyone else her personally knows a returning veteran that had a problem assimilating back into their home communities.
7Their conclusion isn't unreasonable, but I think it should be stressed over and over again that DHS doesn't believe that all, or even a majority of, veterans will become "homegrown terrorist," just that the susceptibility is there.
Although, I don't see why this had to be announced in public at all. To me, it would make more sense as an announcement within the agency.
8G'pa, throughout history among veterans returning from war have been some who had difficulty assimilating back into their home communities. Just because I don't personally know a billionaire doesn't mean they don't exist.
9I think this is the case of the messenger being the problem. A lot of people don't beleive that Obama and his admin truly want any kind of dissent, soooo they are more likely to take this and get outraged.
Personally, I'm not worried about my phone being tapped and I don't think anyone else should be either. I doubt they are pouring man hours into this since there are obviously bigger threats to be dedicating time to. And this report is the same one that is done every year, so its not a new expenditure....
Yea it bothers me a bit that I'm not considered to be "extreme" since I'm prolife and beleive in small govt and gun rights, but whatever... when the black Suburban shows up at my door, then I'll be worried!
10"Yea it bothers me a bit that I'm not considered to be "extreme" since I'm prolife and beleive in small govt and gun rights, but whatever... when the black Suburban shows up at my door, then I'll be worried!"
Do you mean it bothers you that you aren't considered extreme?
Liberals have monitored and cautioned against getting on the government radar for as long as I can remember. For years, my mother warned me that I was going to ruin family members' government/military careers for going to rallies, joining peace groups and writing to public officials. Not once did I ever hear a conservative warned that the government might not like what they were doing.
Welcome to our world.
11Grr, 'liberals have BEEN monitored...'
12Zeze, it made my day to see you calling me middle of the road
13Oh whoops! Sorry I mean that I *AM* considred extreme.
Steph maybe you never heard it because you don't travel in those circles, beleive me there's plenty of watch list to go around!
14haha Mich, I think that says a lot about where middle lies as well...
15Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.