Prison blues: States slimming down inmate meals
By SHANNON McCAFFREY
ATLANTA (AP) — The recession is hitting home for inmates, too: Some cash-strapped states are taking aim at prison menus.
Georgia prisoners already didn't get lunch on the weekends, and the Department of Corrections recently eliminated the midday meal on Fridays, too. Ohio may drop weekend breakfasts and offer brunch instead. Other states are cutting back on milk and fresh fruit.
Officials say prisoners are still getting enough calories, but family members and critics say the changes could make prisoners irritable and food a valuable commodity, increasing the possibility of violence.
In Georgia, inmates are still getting the same number of daily calories: 2,800 for men and 2,300 for women. The portions at breakfast and dinner are bigger on days only two meals are served.
Almost 5 percent of the state's 58,295 prisoners still get three meals every day because they are diabetic, pregnant or have other special health needs.
Barbara Helie, whose 25-year-old son Nicholas is serving time for armed robbery in Valdosta State Prison, said he would go hungry without the roughly $60 a week she puts into his account to buy instant soups, cheese, beef sticks and other snacks at the prison commissary.
"I don't know how the guys who don't have someone on the outside helping out handle it," Helie said. "Food has been an ongoing issue for him ... He's hungry a lot."
Georgia's fast-growing prison system — the fifth-largest in the nation — has been hit hard by the same budget woes plaguing other states. For the current fiscal year, the state has slashed almost 10 percent from the state Department of Corrections' $1.1 billion budget.
Friday lunches were a casualty of the department's decision to save money on gas and other costs by scaling back the prisoner work week from five eight-hour days to four 10-hour days, said Calvin Brown, Georgia Department of Corrections Deputy Director of Facility Operations. He couldn't say how much the state is saving.
For years now, Georgia prisoners have received only two meals a day on weekends because they don't work, so now the same holds true on Fridays. They get three meals on work days because they are exerting themselves on road crews and litter pick up.
There are no federal minimum caloric standards for state prison systems, though they are encouraged to adhere to guidelines established by the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies Food and Nutrition Board. Georgia officials say they follow those guidelines, and Brown said there have been some complaints from inmates and family members but no lawsuits.
In Ohio, prisons director Terry Collins said eliminating breakfast on the weekends and replacing it with brunch "could save us some real dollars when it comes to staffing and food costs."
He said the move would not upset prisoners because it would not sacrifice quality.
"I don't expect them to be as good as mom's home cooking, but the food should be cooked and presented properly," Collins said.
Other states have kept three meals but are scaling back menus. Earlier this month, Alabama reduced the milk and fresh fruit it serves to save $700,000. Alabama inmates now receive an apple or an orange once a week, down from twice a week. Milk has been reduced from seven servings per week to three. Tennessee has also cut back on milk portions for men — from two servings a day to one — to save $600,000.
Gordon Crews, a professor at Marshall University in West Virginia, wrote a book looking at correctional violence and said historically there have been links between food and problems behind bars. He pointed to a February riot at the Reeves County Detention Center in Texas caused in part by poor food quality.
"A lot of prisoners will see something like that as some kind of retribution against them or some kind of mistreatment," Crews said. "It'll be something that the correctional staff will pay the price for ... another reason (for inmates) to argue and fight back."
In Georgia, reports of inmate assaults — on both staff and other inmates — are up substantially for fiscal year 2009 over the year before, according to data obtained by The Associated Press through an open records request.
Prison officials deny the increase has anything to do with the shrinking menu but didn't provide an explanation.
Sara Totonchi, of the Southern Center for Human Rights, called the elimination of Friday lunch part of a troubling trend of budget cuts in Georgia's correctional system.
"We don't think this is a good idea," she said. "It destabilizes things inside the prison and that is not good for any of the inmates or staff."
Associated Press writers Phillip Rawls in Montgomery, Ala., and Erik Schelzig in Nashville, Tenn., contributed to this report.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iuiMA5jtXxR5zuz9uMoG5u...
McQ by Alexander McQueen
2,800 calories a day seems like way too much as it is! I doubt Helie's son would really "go hungry" on that.
1Anyway, on the article as a whole, I'd have to say this is something that I never really thought about, but it does make sense. Obviously these people need to be fed, but I wouldn't say it's inhumane or anything of the sort to just serve brunch instead of breakfast and lunch some days or to cut back on expensive items. I do understand the point about it possibly breeding more violence due to competition for food, but I feel that our prison system is filled with violence as it is and that some people there will fight no matter what.
2The recommended number of calories per day for active men is 2800 calories and for sedentary men and active woman is 2200, so it is not that far off. I don't know how I feel about this. If they are getting what they need in terms of calories and nutrition, I don't think it is inhumane.
3Really, Roar? My friend's a nutritionist and she said it's close to 2200 for active men and 1800 for active women. Maybe she's used to working with people who want to lose weight, not maintain it.
4We've discussed this in the past so I know how this thread likely will go, but what the heck: I still think it is morally wrong and counter-productive for prisons to economize on a basic necessity of life.
5I can understand taking away snacks, but to get rid of a whole meal altogether? thats cruel.
6I guess I missed the past discussions.
I certainly agree that it's morally wrong to eliminate a basic necessity of life. But I don't find snacks a basic necessity of life.
7Out of curiosity, what do you find morally wrong about serving the same amount of food, but just serving it twice a few days a week instead of three times?
8I said "economizing" because I don't have the exact details of what each state is doing. I think serving the same amount of food, but just serving it twice a few days a week instead of three times is likely more counter-productive than wrong - but I would have to know more about the actual menu because it wouldn't take much to make it wrong.
But think about it: we're advised to eat at least 3 times a day, small meals up to 5, to stay healthy and in balance (sugar levels, etc). How hungry, how efficient, how alert, how cranky, would you be if you got the exact number of calories you need at two meals? How far apart are those meals? Do they eat at 7 or 8 a.m., then not until 6?
No wonder inmates assaults are up, and no wonder the prison didn't want to offer details.
Fresh fruit once a week? Buying instant soup? Those are recipes for health problems which will only end up costing the states more money. Why not start a prison garden and make the inmates raise their own fruits and vegetables?
9dont they have to bend over alot to garden?
10No, you squat.
11Beans and rice baby beans and rice. Each bean has it's own distinct flavor so it wouldn't taste the same every night, toss some pork scraps in it for flavor and you have a very nutritious meal high in fiber and dirt cheap. No to mention the gas will be added punishment for their crimes. We save money, keep them healthy and make them suffer just a little more
12On the other hand, these people are in prison, not an entertainment facility. If they have what professionals deem the proper number of calories and nutrients, then so be it. If they want better food, there's always obeying the law.
13As long as no one is punishing them by denying them food and they are not starving, they are still doing a lot better than many poor people in this country.
Hmmm... this article should be in my forum: Swift Justice. Quick and to the point.
I think alot of people here might form a mob and toss me out of sugahland after they read what I have to say.
For MANY years I worked twice a week at both a male and a female prison doing medical procedures. These people are NOT being undernourished. They watch TV, work out, play some ball, and even go swimming. They can CHOOSE to work or learn a skill and you'd be shocked at how many pass on that opportunity.
Gee...maybe our prison system should adopt that one in Arizona. They make them wear PINK prison uniforms, live in tents, eat bologna sandwiches and drink water. Yeah...they are in prison to be punished people!
When a "punishment" is better than a portion of our society living in cars or streets, I cannot feel sorry for them because they lose a meal. I only eat twice a day and that is not a punishment---it is because I have a life--much to do and not much time to do it in. They on the other hand, have loads of time on thier hands to consider that next meal. Gee---How many calories can a person lose "worrying" about a meal?
14BTW...prison assaults are up because they have cut the budget--lowered the amount of guards that should be there. Of course they are gonna get out of line if there isn't enough staff there to keep them there.
15I pretty much agree with you, lilkimbo.
"Out of curiosity, what do you find morally wrong about serving the same amount of food, but just serving it twice a few days a week instead of three times?"
I don't think it's morally wrong, but think it's a better idea to spread out the meals. When a person gets hungry, they get irritable, it just increases the risk of more problems. They probably cut it down to 2 meals sometimes because it's not easy to go through all of the "routines" to bring people into the meal areas. I can't say for sure though, I've never been in a prison.
Does anyone know what the average meal looks like for a prisoner? I wonder what kind of food they're being fed. I remember seeing clips in one of my Criminal Justice classes and the prison they were at fed them A LOT of junk food.
16Having worked in both the male and female prision system I have seen what they eat.
Breakfast is usually cereal, coffee, milk and fruit Or toast, eggs, meat and fruit. Lunch is typically sandwiches, fruit, milk. Dinner is some form of casserole, vegies (cooked or salad), roll, fruit, milk and sometimes a cookie. They are allowed to take the fruit, bread, or carton of milk with them back to their room to eat later. They have ice and water anytime they want it.
Pregnant inmates get twice the milk, prenatal vitamins and more food if they need it. Anyone with dietary needs--they are well taken care of.
It doen't not matter if they serve it two times or three times a day--they still get the same amount of food AND they can take some of it back to their rooms. They can also buy snacks from the store in the prision.
These people eat better than the homeless--have TV--clean clothes--medical care--and education IF they choose to take advantage of it. I CANNOT feel sorry for them. They broke the law.
17BTW...if they are diabled and recieve disabilty payments---they still get that money in jail.
Samething about SSI benefits or retirement benefits. If they qualify--they get it.
Consider this: A prisioner gets shot while commiting a crime, gets declared disabled in some way--> he collects disability forever! That is stupid especially if they are there for life. Being in prison they will be taken care of medically---o why get paid those benefits? Crazy stupid.
A prisoner sitting in prision for LIFE will get SSI benefits when they are qualified either by age OR they can be qualified by a disability (the favorite among them is "bi-polar disorder") which actually automatically gives them those benefits thanks to former president Clinton.
If they want to save money---this is what they should change. Those are our tax dollars at work!
18Wow, thanks for the info. When I took Criminal Investigation in college (best class I've ever taken), I learned a lot about the criminal system from my retired police officer professor, but he didn't always go into detail because of the time restrictions we had. He disapproved of a lot of things... the benefits the prisoners got mostly, and especially the fact that if a woman was sexually assaulted, for example, she had to pay for a lawyer while the criminal could get one for free if he couldn't "afford" it (this goes for any case like this).
19I agree that any prisoners need to be treated fairly, but our criminal system goes way beyond what is fair. When these people are treated better than the average citizen, there's a problem.
20Yeah...can you imagine how much money our govenrment is handing over to convicts as SSI benefits? If they stopped that---and only that---and put that money into our education system the effect would be tremendous.
21Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.