I don't usually go on Jezebel, but I was on another site with a link to this story. This is pretty sick, in my opinion.
"Does being an 'artist' trump being a rapist?" asks Melissa Silverstein of Women & Hollywood. According to 138 people in the film industry who signed a petition demanding the immediate release of Roman Polanski from Swiss custody, yep!
And they're joined by another group of writers and artists Bernard-Henri Lévy is rounding up! On his roster: Salman Rushdie, Milan Kundera, Neil Jordan, Isabelle Adjani, Isabelle Huppert, Mike Nichols, Diane von Furstenberg, and Paul Auster, among others. As for the other petition (launched by French film industry association SACD), in addition to the signatories posted at The Wrap last night (Pedro Almodovar, Wes Anderson, Darren Aronofsky, Monica Bellucci, Stephen Frears, Tilda Swinton?!?), new big-name rape apologists are signing on all the time! Today, we can add Martin Scorsese, David Lynch, Terry Gilliam and — wait for it — Woody Allen to the list.
Woody Allen, people. It would be kind of funny, if it weren't a big f*cking list of celebrities who support a child rapist.
Also, let us not forget Whoopi "rape-rape" Goldberg, and of course Debra Winger's statement as president of the Zurich Film Festival jury. As Variety reported:
Winger... on Monday demanded Polanski's release and criticized Swiss authorities for their "philistine collusion" in arresting Polanski as he entered the country.
"This fledgling festival has been unfairly exploited, and whenever this happens the whole art world suffers," Winger said in a statement on Monday, standing together with the other four international jury members who wore red badges reading "Free Polanski" as they announced plans to continue the fest.
That's apparently what this is about, in the minds of all these great artistes: Philistinism. A failure to appreciate A) Polanski's genius and B) the sanctity of international film festivals. No, I am not even kidding about the second part. From the SACD petition:
By their extraterritorial nature, film festivals the world over have always permitted works to be shown and for filmmakers to present them freely and safely, even when certain States opposed this.
The arrest of Roman Polanski in a neutral country, where he assumed he could travel without hindrance, undermines this tradition: it opens the way for actions of which no one can know the effects.
Yes I can totally see how arresting a fugitive child rapist is a slippery slope toward censorship. If I were a creative professional, I'd certainly be concerned about the authorities coming after me and my work! Except, I am a creative professional, and I'm not worried, because unlike Roman Polanski, I have neither raped a child nor jumped bail and evaded capture for three decades. See how that works? Don't rape a child and flee sentencing for it: Enjoy your personal and artistic freedom! Rape a child and flee: Get arrested! (Eventually.) Is there something I'm missing here? Like the part that explains how arresting a fugitive child rapist has f*ck-all to do with festivals traditionally being a haven for controversial filmmakers? Is that really supposed to mean they should also be a haven for known felons?
I guess so. The petition continues:
Roman Polanski is a French citizen, a renown and international artist now facing extradition. This extradition, if it takes place, will be heavy in consequences and will take away his freedom.
How - HOW - are people writing and signing sh*t like that with a straight face? Might I remind you, film industry, that the extradition will be "heavy in consequences" and take away his freedom because he raped a child and fled the country over thirty years ago? We're really just supposed to skip over that detail? Really? And in fact, we should more properly be outraged that this happened in a country "where he assumed he could travel without hindrance" — an assumption made because he's been banging around Europe for three decades, making movies, winning awards, living as a free man, on account of how he skipped bail after pleading guilty to statutory rape? On what planet is, "But he didn't think he'd get caught!" a legitimate excuse for going easy on a fugitive child rapist?
Fugitive. Child. Rapist. Just keep saying it until it sinks in. I'll wait.
And I'll keep waiting while Lévy and company give the same exercise a shot. Perhaps when they're done, they'll appreciate the absurdity of a statement like, "Apprehended like a common terrorist Saturday evening, September 26, as he came to receive a prize for his entire body of work, Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison."
Correction: Polanski was not actually arrested like a "common terrorist." He was arrested like a common fugitive child rapist. Actually, he was arrested like a distinctly uncommon fugitive child rapist, what with being on his way to pick up a lifetime achievement award for a body of work largely completed while he was evading being sentenced for raping a child. That's really not how things play out for most fugitive child rapists, as I understand it. I'm pretty sure only the white, wealthy, well-connected ones are ever permitted to make such a mockery of justice for so long, let alone be assured that, as the SACD petition puts it, "Filmmakers, actors, producers and technicians — everyone involved in international filmmaking — want him to know that he has their support and friendship." I'm guessing, in fact, that Roman Polanski could most accurately be described as a unique fugitive child rapist.
Lévy's next argument is that Polanski's victim, whom he refers to as "the plaintiff," wants the charges dropped, so what's the big deal? Yesterday at Salon, I explained why, despite my deep sympathy for the victim and the media circus she's been subjected to, I don't think her wishes should take precedence over the law. So today, I'll only point out that the victim is not the plaintiff in the criminal case. She was the plaintiff in the civil case she brought against Polanski, for which she was awarded a settlement. Now, it's Los Angeles County's score to settle, on behalf of the people, not the victim.
Of course, many of the celebs standing up for Polanski are people of Los Angeles County. Let's just hope the authorities remember that although those might be the loudest ones, they're hardly the only ones. And the public interest is, in fact, better served by punishing people who rape children and flee the country than it is by bowing to famous and powerful people who somehow believe that really good films make up for felonies — or that living, traveling, and working openly in your chosen profession for 30 years, just on a different continent, is "punishment enough." (But the poor man was always looking over his shoulder! Yes, because he was a fugitive child rapist. Do you see how it always ends up there?)
I'm just sickened to see some of the names on these lists — people I've long admired, and whose work I've shelled out for on multiple occasions. But at the same time, I'm glad the names of unapologetic child rapist supporters are being made public, so I can consider their stance on art vs. child rape when choosing how to spend my entertainment dollars. Last summer, Tiger Beatdown's Sady Doyle proposed that we join her in a game she likes to call "Don't Give Money To The Rapist."
Basically, most rapists have jobs. Sometimes they're really good at their jobs! But if, for example, a rapist is someone who makes movies which you want to see, you have to balance what you don't know with what you know. Here's a little breakdown, as far as this relates to noted rapist Roman Polanski, and the film Rosemary's Baby:
WHAT YOU DON'T KNOW: Whether or not you are going to enjoy Rosemary's Baby, a film made by noted rapist Roman Polanski. It could go either way!
WHAT YOU KNOW: Roman Polanski raped someone.
Now, ask yourself: is it worth contributing, in any way, to the well-being of a rapist? Probably not!
I think that sounds like a superfun game, and I also think I'd enjoy one called, "Don't Give Money To People Who Think Rapists Deserve Absolution, Sympathy, Freedom and Regular Public Tongue Baths."
Unfortunately, playing it basically means you can never watch a movie again.
Source: http://jezebel.com/5370356/letters-from-hollywood-roman-polanskis-rape-o...
Levi's
I'm apalled that there is anyone alive who thinks this guy doesn't deserve to be severly punished for what he did to that 13yr old girl. I don't care that it happened 30 years ago. The fact the he fled the country and has yet to be prosecuted makes it all the more aggregious.
1woody allen, thats like hannibal lecter telling the Donner party they are cool.
2I'm not surprised Woody Allen signed it.
3I don't care what else he does in life, I don't care what the girl says now. He pleaded guilty to a crime and fled sentencing. That's not okay for anyone.
4It so much reminds of Jack Abbot, a career criminal who wrote a book while in prison. In the early eighties . The book "Belly of The Beast", got great reviews from the NY Times, at a time when the a NYT review would make or break a book. The guy get out of prison, gets invited to all the "in parties" on the upper West Side, he had the world by the tail. Well he murdered a man, I do not remember the details any more, but at the time. Norman Mailer came out saying that because Abbot was such a "remarkable talent". He should not go back to prison. He held the position in effect that if you are gifted in the arts you are above the law, up to and including a worthless human life, that never will have any impact on society. Society as he defined it obviously.
5I can't believe anyone would support a child rapist not being punished for his crime...
6I've seen people commenting elsewhere that she wasn't really a child, that the court documents don't actually contain the word rape, that she was already sexually active, etc.-as if these are excuses for what Polanski did. Our world saddens/disgusts/frustrates me sometimes.
7Kim - seriously??
8That is really disgusting.
Yes. I don't understand people. There were actually a few comments that bordered on disgusting over on BuzzSugar. People weren't as bad/didn't blatantly state that what Polanski did was OK for those reasons, but the obvious implication was there.
9it's hollywood, they live in their own little bubble.
10The court documents also show her testimony that she pleaded with Polanski to stop and to to take her home. Oh,and what fails to get mentioned by the the Hollywood elite that amongst everything else she was penetrated anally.
11It is sickening and downright wrong, I do not understand how anyone could support and sign a petition for his release.
12Hollywood, rich celebs that think they are beyond the law....
The man may be an "artist", but he is a child raping fugitive artist who belongs in prison.
I think he needs to be punished. What he did to her was so wrong on so many levels.
I don't think people should assume that the majority of Hollywood supports this man. I mean who are: "Milan Kundera, Neil Jordan, Isabelle Adjani, Isabelle Huppert, Mike Nichols", etc? There are tens of thousands of people that work in the industry, and to only get 138 people on your petition is pretty weak.
I think people are afraid to speak out against him because of his power, but there are some who are speaking out. Kirstie Alley went on a rampage on her Twitter the other day, and I have seen other artists speaking out against his actions.
Anyway, I just don't think that these few people on the petition really represent what "Hollywood" thinks about the matter.
I do think there is a HUGE problem in our country with accepting the rape of teen girls for what it is. I mean, R. Kelly has had video, pictures, multiple victims, and he has yet to be punished for it. I think that many men don't take it seriously...because they would tap it if they could.
13I've seen that too, Kim. And I saw a clip of Whoopi Goldberg saying it was rape but it wasn't really rape. I've lost all respect for these people now
14Being an artist never trumps being a rapist.
"I do think there is a HUGE problem in our country with accepting the rape of teen girls for what it is. I mean, R. Kelly has had video, pictures, multiple victims, and he has yet to be punished for it. I think that many men don't take it seriously...because they would tap it if they could."
It is a sad state of affairs but I completely agree with you. Seriously, how many porn sites are their on the inter featuring teen girls? Quite a few. What about the whole Catholic school girl fantasy? It wouldn't be a cliche if it weren't a turn on for many men.
15So true Kas. Creepier now that I'm really thinking about it
16Roman Polanski is a pedophile and should be imprisoned for it. I don't care if this drags on for another year and he's near death. I say drag his sick ass to prison and let him rot there until his final days on earth.
17I agree Pink
18I'll be so glad when this pedophile and rapist goes to prison.
19Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.