Friday, April 17, 2009 by The Guardian/UK
by Alison Flood

The American Library Association's 'most challenged' books of 2008 include Khaled Hosseini's bestseller alongside Philip Pullman's Dark Materials and And Tango Makes Three
Khaled Hosseini has joined the illustrious ranks of Philip Pullman and the authors of a story about gay penguins, after his novel The Kite Runner became one of the books that inspired most complaints in America last year.
The bestselling and critically acclaimed title, the story of a 12-year-old Afghan and his betrayal of his best friend, includes the rape of a boy, and provoked challenges in the US over what objectors saw as sexual content and offensive language. Some objections led to the removal of the book from library shelves, while others saw it replaced with bowdlerised versions minus the offending scenes, according to the American Library Association, which compiles an annual list of the most challenged titles in the country.
Topping this list in 2008 was, for the third year running, Justin Richardson and Peter Parnell's And Tango Makes Three, a children's book about two male penguins who bring up an orphaned chick. Based on a newspaper story the authors saw about a zookeeper who noticed two of his penguins trying to hatch a stone, the book was criticised for being pro-gay, anti-religion and anti-family.
"Books that address same-sex parenting, or same-sex relationships, are particularly prone to challenges in the US," said Deborah Caldwell-Stone, deputy director of the ALA's office for intellectual freedom, which has collected information on challenged books for the last 20 years. "In the case of And Tango Makes Three, there are many parents who believe it inappropriate to teach children anything at all about homosexual relationships, even in the form of a picture book about a true story."
Another stalwart of the ALA's list, Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials trilogy, rose to second place overall in 2008 from fourth the previous year, distressing challengers over its political viewpoint, religious viewpoint and violent scenes. Last year Pullman said his immediate reaction on hearing the news was "glee". "They never learn," he said. "The inevitable result of trying to ban something - book, film, play, pop song, whatever - is that far more people want to get hold of it than would ever have done if it were left alone. Why don't the censors realise this?"
Caldwell-Stone said the film of The Golden Compass, based on the first novel in Pullman's trilogy, had renewed attacks on the sequence from Catholic pressure groups. "In many cases school boards reacted precipitously and removed it - then a few weeks later they returned it to the shelves," she said.
This year, challengers appeared to be focusing their efforts on more recent releases, with Mark Twain's The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (which had drawn criticism for racism), Alice Walker's The Color Purple (challenged for sexual content, homosexual content and offensive language) and Maya Angelou's I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings (sexual content) all dropping out of the top 10 after riding high last year.
The ALA recorded 513 challenges in 2008, up from 420 in 2007. The ALA defines a challenge as "a formal, written complaint, filed with a library or school, requesting that materials be removed or restricted because of content or appropriateness". It estimates that as few as one in five challenges are actually reported. "We believe this is just the tip of the iceberg," said Caldwell-Stone.
Seventy-four books were actually removed from shelves following challenges last year, the ALA said, ranging from Jodi Picoult's bestselling novel My Sister's Keeper, pulled for its sexually explicit content, to Sherman Alexie's The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian, which includes references to masturbation. Alexie's comments at the time echoed Pullman's, with the author telling local press that "the amazing thing is these banners never understand they are turning this book into a sacred treasure. We don't write to try and be banned, but it is widely known in the [young adult] world, we love this sh*t."
"While not every book is right for each reader, every reader has the right to choose reading materials for themselves and their families and should be able to find those materials in libraries, classrooms, and bookstores. Our goal is to protect one of our most precious fundamental rights - our freedom to read," said Caldwell-Stone.
The ALA celebrates all banned and challenged books every year with Banned Books Week, founded by Judith Krug, a tireless anti-censorship campaigner who died last week after a long illness, aged 69. Often quoted as saying that "censorship dies in the light of day", Krug was the director of the ALA's office for intellectual freedom and executive director of its Freedom to Read Foundation for more than 40 years.
"Judith had an abiding faith in the power of 'the community of the book' - she was convinced that when librarians, publishers, booksellers, and authors stand together in defence of intellectual freedom we are unstoppable. She believed in our obligation to take on that fight wherever and whenever it arose, and more often than not she led the charge," said Judith Platt, president of the Freedom to Read Foundation. "She considered librarianship to be the highest of callings and there is an entire generation of librarians out there whose commitment to intellectual freedom was forged and shaped by Judith Krug."
The ALA's top ten most frequently challenged books of 2008 in full:
1. And Tango Makes Three by Justin Richardson and Peter Parnell
Reasons: anti-ethnic, anti-family, homosexuality, religious viewpoint, unsuited to age group
2. His Dark Materials trilogy by Philip Pullman
Reasons: political viewpoint, religious viewpoint, violence
3. TTYL; TTFN; L8R, G8R series by Lauren Myracle
Reasons: offensive language, sexually explicit, unsuited to age group
4. Scary Stories series by Alvin Schwartz
Reasons: occult/satanism, religious viewpoint, violence
5. Bless Me, Ultima by Rudolfo Anaya
Reasons: occult/satanism, offensive language, religious viewpoint, sexually explicit, violence
6. The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky
Reasons: drugs, homosexuality, nudity, offensive language, sexually explicit, suicide, unsuited to age group
7. Gossip Girl series by Cecily von Ziegesar
Reasons: offensive language, sexually explicit, unsuited to age group
8. Uncle Bobby's Wedding by Sarah S. Brannen
Reasons: homosexuality, unsuited to age group
9. The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini
Reasons: offensive language, sexually explicit, unsuited to age group
10. Flashcards of My Life by Charise Mericle Harper
Reasons: sexually explicit, unsuited to age group
Jaeger
I love "The Kite Runner" and see no reason why it shouldn't be in a library. It brings to light a lot of issues that have been going on for a long time. Its a great story, and it really makes you think.
1The only one i agree with, Is #7, but not banning it. I want it to be labeled as Adult fiction, not young adult because its too explicit for young girls. As is the twilight series.
Banning books is ridiculous, someone is going to get offended over whatever and we shouldnt have to cater to the closeminded.
2completely agree, CG.
3Yeah. I definitely would not care for my hypothetical young adult child to be reading Gossip Girl.
4I agree with you CG. And that Twilight needs to be added. Completely innappropriate for the age group.
5I still don't understand the absurdity that is Twilight. Sparkling Vampire????? I actually watched the movie on Youtube a couple of weeks ago and I just don't get what the hoopla is.
And I've yet to join the Gossip Girl bandwagon either.
6Are people seriously still trying to ban books? Simple solutiong, don't read them if they offend you, problem solved.
7Roar they are trying to save people's morality
8I agree, Roar. Don't ban books, just label them properly and make sure your kids aren't reading them if they're not suited to their age.
9And, Twilight is lame. I rented the dvd out of curiosity and was completely unimpressed.
10I rented it too and it was wackity wack. Its like the pre-school version of TrueBlood.
11the movie leaves out alot, so parents get a false sense of what the content really is in the books. My rule of thumb, read the book before your kid does. My sister got the second book for my niece and I told her "you know that the girl in that starts cutting herself because of some guy?" not the impression you want to put on your young girls as okay behavior. That book was gone in a second!
12Twilight completely disreguards every rule in the vampire fantasy genre which irritates me to no end. I've heard teenage girls saying it is okay for Edward to hit Bella because he really didn't mean it. And she probably deserved it anyway. (WHAT!?) While I do appreciate the wait until you are married sentiment, afterwards Bella begs Edward to sleep with her. Does whatever she has to. Yeah, that's a message we need young girls to have.
This whole Twi-maina stuff (tatttos, $30 for pics with the hand model, etc) just makes me mad. I have read on several blogs where fans make death threats against people who have anything bad to say against Twilight. One lady had an email sent to her wish her baby (that she was pregnant) with would die. I mean it's insane.
I really dislike Twilight.
13I haven't read most of these books apart from the first Pullman book. I hated it and do agree it was really violent (or at least too violent for the kind of kids' book I expected). But as people said, just label it differently instead of banning!
Oh, and don't get me started on the Twilight books and how shockingly anti-feminist (and many more other things) I found them. That would probably deserve a whole thread.
14I read this yesterday in the paper. I don't get banning books either
15Sorry I skimmed so forgive me if it states, but these are being banned from school libraries right?
If thats the case, then I don't mind. If someone wants to read it they go order it online or go to the bookstore or the public library.
However, banning a book just makes it sell more, so seems kinda counterintuitive.
16Star and Advah.. I found out the author of the Twilight book is a Mormon... kinda explains the anti-feminist theme of the books. I refuse to read it. Not going there. I have friends, grown women who are obsessed with it and are like "oh I wish I had a man who love me like Edward Loves Bella". I'm sorry, having a man stalk you want to take bite of you literally, and hit you, isn't my idea of love.
17Myst her other book "the host" is a great book. nothing to do with vampires.
18Myst - yeah, I found that out after I read the books. I read all of them, but it was the fourth one that really got my feathers ruffled. Then I really started to look at the other three books with a different eye. What really bothers me the most is that she says she didn't write them for anyone but herself so she doesn't have to answer to anyone about her books. Then why write them????
Okay. Going to have to quit talking about Twilight, because it really, really gets me riled up.
19I haven't read a good novel in a while. The only one I actively obsess over are the JD Robb's In Death Series and wait patiently ever Feb and Nov for the new ones. Now if women wants a man who have such an intense love for his wife, they need to look no further than Roarke.
20I am rereading the Southern Vampire series, for the fourth time.
21Im reading them again too CG. Everytime I read the next book I fall in love with the characters even more.
22Especially Eric.
23Eric
I've reread the series, again, patient waiting for True Blood Season 2.
Man... way to derail this thread.
24*patiently
25Wait Edward never hits Bella. I liked the Twilight for what it was. I also read the Southern Vampire Series (amazing) and IMO Stephanie Mayer was obnoxiously age appropriate. I mean 100+ year old virgin...in what reality. But me and Stephanie have a serious author reader relationship issues. If she were just a bad writer then I wouldn't care less, but she's not. I read the Host and it's like she's squashing her talent, either by her manager's wishes or her own obsessive masochistic sense on morality. She could have focused more on the sci-fi/sociological element of the Host and it would have been brilliant.
26Myst - yep I knew about Meyer, and refused to read the books for a long time simply because I generally despise teen romance. Then some of my coworkers really got into the series, and I got curious and read the books (or rather listened to the audiobooks) to know what the fuss was about.
It made me so angry I still get really upset talking about it! I expected to be annoyed at the abstinence/religious topics because I don't share Meyer's beliefs, but was actually fine with that. Instead, as Starangel mentioned, I got really angry at the whiny Bella is constantly begging the dominant male who gets to make decisions for her, or, as CG pointed out, at the glamourisation of teen depression and self-harm. And I won't even mention the quality (or lack, thereof) of the writing. And I'll stop there or I'll get carried away again.
I'll just say that if I ever have kids, I'll forbid them to read those books and make them read Betty Friedan instead hah! I did enjoy the movie even though it was ridiculous, but (and I feel I can hear my parents speak) but I do think these books are actually unhealthy. I seriously don't want kids to think this is a normal behaviour, or they should see Meyer's story as the Ideal Relationship.
And I'll stop here with Twilight.
Re books however, I'd highly recommend Richard Russo's Empire Falls. I finished reading it earlier this week, and it's by far one of the best books I've read in years (it's a bit long but reads really quickly). I don't want to give the plot away, but it deals with current issues, and I thought the teenagers in the books were really well portrayed, and devoid of the usual teenage stereotypes.
27My 13 year old grandaughter just loves the twilight series, she has read them all, and reread the first, which is her favorite, I gather. She also has a poster of the vampire on her bedroom wall.
Banning an adult book for any reason is insane, I can see a case being made for age appropriate. The way around it would be to color code the binder of such book, and let the parent decide if he/she thinks the child is mature enough for the material inside.
28Okay, banning The Kite Runner? THat is pathetic! It's an amazing book!
29Okay, banning The Kite Runner? THat is pathetic! It's an amazing book!
30I DESPISE the Twilight phenomenon. However, I adore the Pullman series, but NO they are not written for children. I don't think that was his intention.
31Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.