Eva Paterson
President and Founder, Equal Justice Society, Posted: August 28, 2009 02:56 PM
After smearing White House special advisor Van Jones for days on his show, Glenn Beck said on August 27, 2009: "I want to point out the silence; no one has challenged these facts -- they just attack me personally."
Well, the White House is wise to stay above the fray but someone has to set the record straight. And as the person who first hired Van Jones, initially as a legal intern and later as a legal fellow, I am in a unique position to know the truth.
And the truth is: Beck is fabricating his facts.
For instance: several times on his show, Beck has said or implied that Van went to prison for taking part in the Rodney King riots.
No Criminal Convictions
Van has never served time in any prison. He has never been convicted of any crime. And just to be clear: Van was not even in Los Angeles during those tumultuous days.
I know because he was working for me -- in San Francisco -- when the four Los Angeles police officers were acquitted in the beating of Rodney King. I was the Executive Director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area when Van was an intern.
The verdicts came down on April 29, 1992. I remember Van (who was then a legal intern working with me from Yale Law School) coming into my office in San Francisco. Many of us, including Van, sat there together, listening to the news and weeping. We were all in a state of shock. That night, TV showed the tragic images of LA burning.
The next day, when an initially peaceful march in downtown San Francisco devolved into chaos, Van left the area in tears. He was not involved in any destructive activity. He even penned an essay despairing of the violence and the state of the country.
So how can Beck make such unsubstantiated claims?
The True Story (From Someone Who Was There)
This is what really happened. On May 8, 1992, the week AFTER the Rodney King disturbances, I sent a staff attorney and Van out to be legal monitors at a peaceful march in San Francisco. The local police, perhaps understandably nervous, stopped the march and arrested hundreds of people -- including all the legal monitors.
The matter was quickly sorted out; Van and my staff attorney were released within a few hours. All charges against them were dropped. Van was part of a successful class action lawsuit later; the City of San Francisco ultimately compensated him financially for his unjust arrest (a rare outcome).
So the unwarranted arrest at a peaceful march -- for which the charges were dropped and for which Van was financially compensated -- is the sole basis for the smear that he is some kind of dangerous criminal.
Van has spoken often about that difficult period 17 years ago -- and its impact on him, as a young law student. But to imply that he was somehow a rioter who went to prison is absurd. Beck also bizarrely claims that Van was arrested in the Seattle WTO protests. That is just a flat-out falsehood.
You don't have to take my word for it. Arrests and convictions are all a matter of public record. Beck is at best relying on Internet rumors or even inventing claims to boost his ratings.
Beck is no more accurate with present facts than he is with past ones.
Not a Mysterious 'Czar"
Beck has said repeatedly that Van is some kind of a mysterious "czar," accountable to no one but the President. A simple Internet search shows that this claim is false. A March 10, 2009, press release announced that Van was hired by the Chair of the White House Council on Environmental Quality - to work on her staff as a "special advisor."
In other words, Van is within the normal White House chain of command, reporting to an office confirmed by the United States Senate, just like most White House staffers. Media outlets sometimes use the "czar" shorthand. But the facts show that Van has no mysterious role or extra-constitutional powers.
Beck has implied on two occasions that Van Jones and other Obama appointees were not vetted by the FBI. False. I was interviewed in my own office by an FBI agent, dutifully vetting Van. Yet another fabrication on the part of Mr. Beck.
Beck also claims that Van has somehow gained control over $500 million in Green Jobs Act funding and can hand out millions of dollars at his whim. Again, that is patently ridiculous.
No Authority to Hand out Billions
The law is clear that the Department of Labor has authority over the program, with normal rules governing the funds. Anybody who thinks that a lone government official can pass out money, arbitrarily and without oversight, knows nothing about our legal system. A blizzard of lawsuits would stop any such scheme in its tracks, if one were ever put in place.
Perhaps more importantly: final authority at the Department of Labor lies with the Secretary of Labor. Anyone who thinks that a Senate-confirmed, Cabinet-level Secretary would cede control of a $500 million program to some mid-level White House staffer knows nothing about our political system. It is ridiculous.
Promoting Business-Based Solutions
But I have to take on the worst one: Beck repeatedly and mistakenly asserts that Van is presently a communist.
Once again, this charge is easily refuted - most obviously by the pro-business, market-based ideas Van has promoted for years, including in his best-selling book, The Green Collar Economy. Van's book is a veritable song of praise to capitalism, especially the socially responsible and eco-friendly kind.
Yes, for a while, Van and his student-aged friends ran around spouting 1960s rhetoric and romanticizing revolutionary icons. But that was years ago. Way back then, I counseled him to rethink his tactics and to work for change in wiser ways.
In time, he jettisoned his youthful notions and moved on to seek more effective and attainable solutions.
Fortunately for all of us, it looks like he has found some. Over the past several years, Van has emerged as the perhaps the nation's chief proponent of using business-based solutions to create jobs and clean up the environment. In his book and his speeches, he highlights the key role of entrepreneurship in solving our nation's problems.
The 'Green' Jack Kemp?
Van believes in government clearing the way for private-sector innovation. In a YouTube clip, he said recently that progressives and conservatives should work together to find common ground and create a clean energy economy.
Van said: "We are not promoting welfare. We are promoting work. ... We are not expanding entitlements. We are expanding enterprise and investment. ... We are not trying to redistribute existing wealth. We are trying to reinvent an existing sector, so that we can create NEW wealth - by unleashing innovation and entrepreneurship. This should be common ground."
He has been preaching that gospel, in various forms, for years and years. Van Jones is the nation's "Green" Jack Kemp -- using business-based solutions to attack poverty.
I found it interesting that Bill O'Reilly in his interview repeatedly asked Glenn Beck whether Van Jones' youthful views had changed over time. Beck never answers those inquiries and instead keeps insisting that Van has championed these ideas recently. Again, that is simply not true.
Quotes Taken Out of Context
Upon investigation, it turns out that Beck is quoting (out of context) an article that in fact makes the OPPOSITE point.
The 2005 profile that Beck is flogging actually makes it crystal clear -- even in the headline -- that Jones has "renounced" his earlier views, matured and moved on. Van's transformation is the entire point of the piece, and it is impossible that Beck does not know this.
Fortunately, O'Reilly seemed to sense the truth. I remember seeing O'Reilly interview Van Jones some time ago and was struck by how much respect O'Reilly showed for Jones. Perhaps O'Reilly's knowing queries were prompted by that encounter.
When Van worked for me, he did exhibit that "know it all" quality that so many of us - myself included -- have when we are young. Over the years, I have enjoyed watching him grow and blossom into a loving father and husband -- and a creative, effective leader.
Van Jones: A True Patriot
Mr. Beck's unfounded attacks are misleading and false. All of us who know Van are so very proud of him and the work he is doing to improve the lives of ALL Americans. He has touched and improved thousands of lives in the course of his career. Now he is in a position to help millions.
He will do well because Van is a true patriot, who loves his country. He has dedicated his life to trying to make it better -- especially trying to uplift the poor, the left-out and the left-behind.
In his book, Van draws a distinction between "cheap patriotism" and "deep patriotism." I highly recommend that chapter to Mr. Beck.
I do hope Van is keeping his head up, walking tall and continuing to fight for green businesses and green jobs. Our country needs more of them - and more people like Van.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eva-paterson/glenn-becks-attack-on-van_b_271518.html ![]()
Ash
"Our moment had finally come! We were righteous, fired up, weren't takin' no more!" Jones wrote. "We were one thousand strong on Market Street, with the Bay Bridge shut down in rush hour traffic and the grounds around the state building swarming with angry mobs! Our rallying cry was for justice; our demand was that the System be changed!"
Jones continued, "Yes, the Great Revolutionary Moment had at long last come. And the time, clearly, was ours! So we stole stuff. Y'know, stole stuff. Radios, tennis shoes. Well, not everybody, of course."
Days after he wrote the essay, Jones was arrested along with hundreds of participants in a "peaceful protest" march.
Charges against him ultimately were dropped, and he says he received a "small" settlement.
"I was arrested simply for being a police observer," he later said.
Jones, in the piece he wrote for The Huffington Post, said his essay "captures the pain, frustration and aspirations of a much younger person. But I think it speaks well to the thought process of many young activists at the time."
1http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/04/radicalization-obamas-green-c...
2Jones’s Oakland activism is explicit endorsement of his race-baiting career at Ella Baker, funded by the Soros-supported Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights/Ford Foundation/Rockefeller Foundation, and his Free Mumia agitation in the Bay Area schools — where he lambasted moderate civil rights leaders for objecting to politicizing the classrooms and where his pro-Mumia allies likened supporters of murdered police officer Daniel Faulkner to the KKK.
3whups....
4http://michellemalkin.com/2009/09/03/van-jones-valerie-jarrett-barack-ob...
Here is how we will see which side is grounded in fact. If Van Jones does not resign next week (then in fact all those accusations this week were nonsense. If he does indeed resign by the end of next week and I think it will be over the Labor Day weekend), then Van Jones was indeed proving to be an embarrassment to the President.
Just think that "light weight" gun toting Sarah Palen makes a posting on her face book and gets language she found objectionable removed from the health care bill. Then some as the Libs say Buffon Glen Beck makes a series of charges on his TV show, and forces the resignation of one of Obama’s hand picked czars. What next, could it be Obama caving into those Astroturf’s, and actually tries to work out a bill with the Republicans, that is acceptable to he Astroturfers? MY God the Dems control the White House, The House of Representative and have a super majority in the Senate, not to mention an adoring doting MSM, how incompetent can they be when it comes to administrating and legislating?
5Apparently blatently incompetent to some. Undeniably to others. Blindingly innocent to a majority who will support a statement that the sky is red when it is obvious that it is blue. Saying it isn't true does not make it less so.
6Fox News has a dog in this fight - they've got to boost Beck's ratings and get his advertisers back. There's no way they can make him look less racist, so they're going to deflect attention. They know that they can fool some of the people all of the time.
7Rather then engage in a meaningless debate, I refer back to my comment #5, we will know in the next 3 to 7 days who had the better argument.
8Go back and read your own posts about people whose careers were destroyed by character assassination for political reasons, and then explain to me why it will be in any way meaningful if Van Jones loses his job because of Murdoch's network.
Reminds me of Madame Lafarge.
9If the accusations are bogus, the MSM would be tearing Glen beck and Fox news to pieces, they are silent for a reason. You mean that you think our President is such a coward he would give in to some buffoon on TV? If that is the case how will he handle the world leaders in general and Iran amd North Korea in particular.
10Knitting away under the guillotine.
11madame lefarge sat back knitting making a list of her enemies, till her people were in power then wreaked her havoc....I don't think Glen Beck's people are in power right now. I never even heard of the guy until earlier this Summer, and on popsugar.
12The image holds beautifully.
13I must admit i last read "A Tale of Two Cities almost 60 years ago, so my memory could be faulty. madame defarge was a quite non entity quietly knitting not drawing any attention to herself until The French Revolution was in full swing and she was one of the righteous "citizens", with a list of enemies of the revolution recorded in her knitting.
Correct me if I got my basic facts wrong, it will force me to go back and reread the book.
14You did. Knit on.
15I will hopefully by the end of the month. I have a special fondness for Charles Dickens, he put me on the path that led me to go to college.
16Glenn Beck doesn't need his advertisers back. His audience has doubled since the boycott. There will be plenty of others to step in and fill the void.
As for Jones, a true patriot huh? One who believes the country killed its own people in the 9/11 attacks? Convenient the author left that part out. And since it was only 5 years ago he signed the truther petition, you can't chalk that up to "youthful views".
17Murdoch wants the big money back on Beck.
18The petition called for an investigation into what was known and who knew it before 9/11, and the possibility that some in the Bush Administration "may indeed have deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext for war.” Not a far-fetched notion considering what we've since found that Administration was capable of and how willing it was to lie to do as it pleased. For instance, think of the official lies that surrounded the death of Pat Tillman.
Calling for an investigation acknowledges the need for answers to persistent questions, it does not state a belief.
And it is not a valid reason to question a man's patriotism.
"Calling for an investigation acknowledges the need for answers to persistent questions, it does not state a belief.
And it is not a valid reason to question a man's patriotism."
Thank you.
19Cheeky what's with the whups? Are you ashamed that the only negative information on Van Jones you can find come from sources like Michele Malkin and Fox News?
20There is PLENTY of ammo out there...the "whups" was that I forgot to site my source. Ashamed? Never. I stand by what I say and I "own" it when I am wrong and move forward. To do otherwise would be unwise.
The gentleman in question (using "gentleman" loosely here) has an issue with "owning" his past and instead has tried to bury it...which just makes him seem even more guilty.
If it was indeed the folly of youth he should simply say so. All of us have made mistakes in youth--the value in them is learning from them. Denying them erases any ability to say you learned from it---as he just wants to pretend it didn't happen.
In my opinion he'd be more creditable to simply come clean and move on. He'd never do that so I then feel he has a character flaw.
21Please refer back to comment #5, first paragraph
22Isn't the anticipation marvelous?
23Why should I read post #5 a second time? I didn't agree with anything in it the first time I read it. The second reading just reminded a of the saying, ""A lie told often enough becomes truth". That has become the conservative mantra over the last decade.
24Beck only went after Van Jones because of Color of Change. The advertisment boycott has been successful and smearing Jones is payback.
25So, you don't believe this issue will be settled by the end of next week one way or another
26
27This is Labor Day weekend, so shouldn't he have resined by now? Isn't that what all those conservative talkers were hoping for?
28Today is Saturday, there is still Sunday and Monday.
29I don't think Van Jones is important to the vast majority of Americans. I just hate to see a man targeted for revenge. Beck called the President a racist. Instead of dealing with that he decided to cause a diversion. Those who hate the present administration are happy to go along. Van Jones was chosen as a target because of his connection to Color of Change.
30Today is Saturday, we still have Sunday or Monday. It will be an interesting first day back for congress if he is still a czar.
31You might be right though, Obama would never be so craven as to throw Van Jones overboard, merely because he was accused by a buffoon like Glen Beck, after all such an act would diminish the president and give unbelievable status to Glen Beck. I mean no Buffoon could roll THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
32"A lie told often enough becomes truth".
Czar? Grandpa this has been a waste of time. You've listened the Hannitys, Becks, Malkins, and Coulters of the world so long that you've picked up their tactics. Make the most outrageous claims possible against an opponent to gain a reaction. Stir the pot.
There's nothing so absurd that if you repeat it often enough, people will believe it."
33I would hope congress will have better things to do with their time then to deal with this nonsense.
34I would hope so Kas.
35Hope springs eternal, besides don't the Democrats control the calender? What chance have those Republicans anyway, right?
36HOLY CRAP! He just resigned!
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jjHS8S3jIndU2oI6WHB_Kq...
37You were right on Grandpa!
38You had doubts, Brookrene?
39I did! I never thought he'd have the decency to do so!
Sorry i doubted you!
40Not bad for a buffoon don't you think, if Sarah Palin just making a face book comment, and a buffoon with a daytime TV show like Glen Beck can rattle this Administration force them "to sit", to rollover", what chance do it have dealing with world leaders with agendas?
Facts are a stubborn thing no matter how unpleasant they are to face, ignore them at your own peril.
41The President in fact did the only wise thing, cut his losses, before it was too late.
42Crow anyone?
43You know it is not too bad with a lot of ketchup
44Braised or broiled? Coucous?....Ha ha ..coo coos!
45Enter the three Witches.
1 WITCH. Thrice the brinded cat hath mew'd.
462 WITCH. Thrice and once, the hedge-pig whin'd.
3 WITCH. Harpier cries:—'tis time! 'tis time!
1 WITCH. Round about the caldron go;
In the poison'd entrails throw.—
Toad, that under cold stone,
Days and nights has thirty-one;
Swelter'd venom sleeping got,
Boil thou first i' the charmed pot!
ALL. Double, double toil and trouble;
Fire burn, and caldron bubble.
Yikes. Which witch is the witch that bewitched such as this?
Ya know your gonna get the really scorned rebukes of going way off topic so they can right a wounded pride.
47off topic, wasn't Macbeth a tragedy?
48This whole administration is tragic. They need to look at Holdren next.
Holdren is a supporter of forced public population control. He offered suggestions to select people to permanently damage their ability to reproduce. He co-wrote a book about it....that is how serious he is about it. Can't write that off to "folly of youth" can you?
I wonder what his criteria would be?
Oh....and he is Obama's Science Expert. Here is a post ALL about him.
http://brainphartspoliticalrefuse.tressugar.com/3773745
49http://www.comcast.net/articles/news-general/20090906/US.Obama.Adviser.R...
Oh. I just read that he's resigned.
50Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.