Thirteen major military and veterans groups have joined forces to try to force one senator — Republican Tom Coburn of Oklahoma — to release a hold that he has placed on a major veterans benefits bill.
Coburn has been identified by Senate aides as the lawmaker preventing consideration of S 1963, the Veterans’ Caregiver and Omnibus Health Benefits Act of 2009, by using an informal but legal practice of putting a hold on a bill.
Coburn’s staff did not respond to questions, but Senate aides said the first-term senator has expressed concern about creating new and unfunded benefits and wants the opportunity to amend the measure.
One of Coburn’s suggestions is to divert money from unspent economic and job stimulus programs to cover costs of new benefits for veterans and their families, according to sources who have discussed the issue with Coburn’s staff.
So far, at least, Senate leaders don’t want to let Coburn offer any amendments because of the precedent that would set to delay other legislation. Actual funding for benefits traditionally is handled separately from the bills that authorize the benefits, Senate aides said.
Earlier this fall, Coburn placed holds on S 252, the Veterans Health Care Authorization Act of 2009, and S 728, the Veterans’ Insurance and Benefits Enhancement Act of 2009, which led to the introduction of S 1963, which combines key provisions of the two earlier bills in an effort to get around Coburn’s opposition.
In a letter sent Monday night to the Senate majority leader, Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., the 13 military and veterans groups ask the Senate to get on with it.
“It is essential that Congress act on this comprehensive measure without further delay,” the letter reads. “Thousands of disabled veterans with serious medical conditions and the family members who care for them are counting on this additional support.”
The letter says passing the bill by Veterans Day would be a “fitting way” to honor veterans.
Those signing the letter include the nation’s major veterans groups — The American Legion, Veterans of Foreign Wars, Disabled American Veterans, AmVets, Paralyzed Veterans of America, Blinded Veterans Association, Military Order of the Purple Heart, Vietnam Veterans of America, Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America and Jewish War Veterans, plus the Military Officers Association of America, National Military Family Association and Wounded Warrior Project.
Steve Robertson, legislative director for The American Legion, said delaying the bill hurts families caring for severely wounded combat veterans who would benefit from the stipends, health care, counseling and respite care that would be provided to caregivers in the bill.
“For a lot of family caregivers, delay is costing them their jobs and their savings. It’s having a big impact,” he said.
Robertson said he has spoken to Coburn’s staff about the earlier holds on S 252 and S. 728, but the conversation was fairly one-sided, with Coburn’s aides trying to get Robertson to dissuade veterans from flooding the senator’s office with calls.
“They made it clear that Sen. Coburn sees this as using his rights as a senator to place a hold on a bill, and that he was not doing anything illegal or wrong,” Robertson said. “I agree with that, but that doesn’t mean it makes sense to hold up a bill that would do a lot of good things for veterans that has cleared a committee and is ready for a vote.”
Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., the Senate assistant majority leader, mentioned Coburn’s hold in a Tuesday floor speech without citing Coburn by name, saying that the bill was being held up by one senator over cost.
“How much is a veteran’s life worth?” Durbin asked, adding that he hopes the hold is lifted.
http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2009/11/military_veteransbill_cobur...
Missoni
Selected
Quai D'Orsay
"Coburn’s staff did not respond to questions, but Senate aides said the first-term senator has expressed concern about creating new and unfunded benefits and wants the opportunity to amend the measure."
I applaud this legislator. The delaying of this bill isn't denying existing coverage to anyone. The "hurry up and pass everything" concept that has swept into Washington is both scary and unwise. Many bad pieces of legislation get through when congressmen push them through without due process (All of the bailouts, Yes one was Bush's).
1“How much is a veteran’s life worth?”
I would love to hear Senator Coburn's answer.
2I'd like to know what vet's lives are being offered by the delay of this bill?
3These bills are hardly being rushed:
2009-2010 Veterans Health Care Authorization Act of 2009
A bill to amend title 38, United States Code, to enhance the capacity of the Department of Veterans Affairs to recruit and retain nurses and other critical health-care professionals, to improve the provision of health care veterans, and for other purposes. INTRODUCED IN JANUARY
2009-2010 Veterans' Benefits Enhancement Act of 2009
A bill to amend title 38, United States Code, to enhance veterans' insurance benefits, and for other purposes. INTRODUCED IN MARCH
Even though we have two active wars, and the President is being encouraged by some to hurry and extend one by tens of thousands of personnel for an indefinite period of time, Coburn thinks NOW is the time for him to quibble over the cost of taking care of veterans health care.
If there's ANY question whether we can afford their healthcare, there's NO question that we can't afford the wars.
4We shouldn't be sending soldiers to war if we aren't sure we can take care of them when they get back.
5What insurance benefits do vets returning home need? Their healthcare is takien care of throught the VA? Why do vets need "enhanced" benefits?
6The "enhancements" hardly sound frivolous:
"Veterans' Insurance and Benefits Enhancement Act of 2009 - Directs the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to grant level-premium term life insurance to veterans under age 65 with service-connected disabilities. Increases from $20,000 to $30,000 the maximum amount of supplemental insurance provided through the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for totally disabled veterans.
Removes a condition on the qualification of certain individuals for retroactive benefits from traumatic injury coverage under Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance. Increases the maximum loan guarantee amount under the veterans' mortgage life insurance program from $90,000 to $150,000, then to $200,000 after January 1, 2012.
Establishes an annual cost-of-living adjustment for the temporary payment of dependency and indemnity compensation (DIC) to a veteran's surviving spouse with one or more children under the age of 18.
Provides eligibility requirements for the payment of a special monthly pension based on disability for veterans who already qualify for a service pension based upon age.
Increases amounts of DIC payable to surviving spouses and parents of deceased veterans. Increases, and authorizes the annual adjustment of, pension amounts payable to hospitalized veterans and certain children of veterans of a period of war.
Authorizes and directs the Secretary to pay a: (1) supplemental benefit for the funeral and burial expenses of veterans, making such amount $900 with respect to a non-service-connected death and $2,100 with respect to a service-connected death; and (2) supplemental burial plot allowance for veterans eligible for the current allowance. Authorizes the provision of specially adapted housing assistance for disabled veterans whose disability is due to a severe burn injury.
Authorizes the Secretary to pay a supplemental benefit, for assistance in the purchase of automobiles and other conveyances, for disabled veterans currently eligible for such assistance."
7Why do vets need "enhanced" benefits?
Because of the longevity of the wars we are in, there are many more disabled vets.
The VA needs more nurses, including at home ones. They want to also study the rates of suicide and the hidden wounds of war.
It increases life insurance, eligibility for specialized vehicles etc etc.
Why do they need this? - So they can be given the care they deserve after fighting for their country, so they can get more life insurance that the public sector denies them, so they can drive a car after suffering burns, missing limbs, etc
8The bill is loaded with increased and much needed benefits for a military involved in a long war, as the VA was under prepared for it.
Oops didnt mean to italicize whole thing!!
9Other than the "recruit and train" nurses, those are just benefits. Our soldiers don't need "insurance" to get this care. They just need to go get the care, right? They get it free at the VA. Insurance is to help people pay for coverage that actually costs them money.
10I do not understand your point? They should not get these benefits?
11The soldiers should get these benefits, but this isn't a question of insurance. They get it for free. They don't need insurance.
12It's not as cut and dry as you think:
13http://www.insurance.va.gov/miscellaneous/index.htm
Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.