WASHINGTON – Thousands of gay and lesbian activists marched Sunday from the White House to the Capitol, demanding that President Barack Obama keep his promises to allow gays to serve openly in the military and work to end discrimination against gays.
Rainbow flags and homemade signs dotted the crowds filling Pennsylvania Avenue in front of the White House as people chanted "Hey, Obama, let mama marry mama" and "We're out, we're proud, we won't back down." Many children were also among the protesters. A few counter-protesters had also joined the crowd, which stretched several blocks by the afternoon.
Jason Yanowitz, a 37-year-old computer programmer from Chicago, held his daughter, 5-year-old Amira, on his shoulders. His partner, Annie, had their 2-year-old son, Isiah, in a stroller. Yanowitz said more straight people were turning out to show their support for gay rights.
"If somebody doesn't have equal rights, then none of us are free," he said.
"For all I know, she's gay or he's gay," he added, pointing to his children.
Some participants in the National Equality March woke up energized by Obama's blunt pledge to end the ban on gays serving openly in the military during a speech to the nation's largest gay rights group Saturday night.
The chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee said Sunday that Congress will need to muster the resolve to change the "don't ask, don't tell policy" — a change that the military may be ready for.
"I think it has to be done in the right way, which is to get a buy-in from the military, which I think is now possible," said Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich.
Obama's political energies have been focused on two wars, the economic crisis and health care reform, though he pledged "unwavering" commitment even as he wrestled with those problems.
March organizer Cleve Jones, creator of the AIDS Memorial Quilt and a protege of gay rights pioneer Harvey Milk, said he had initially discouraged a rally earlier in the year. But he and others began to worry Obama was backing away from his campaign promises.
"Since we've seen that so many times before, I didn't want it to happen again," he said. "We're not settling. There's no such thing as a fraction of equality."
Jones noted that the debate over how to achieve progress has at times been bitter, but said people should look to the civil rights debates of 1963.
"There should be heat. There should be controversy because ... we're trying to change the strategy" to pursue full equality rather than a piecemeal approach, he said.
Unlike the first march in 1979 and others in 1987, 1993 and 2000 that included celebrity performances and drew as many as 500,000 people, Sunday's event was driven by grassroots efforts and was expected to be more low-key.
Many organizers were outraged after the passage of California's Proposition 8, which canceled the right of gays to get married in the state, and over perceived slights by the Obama administration.
Kipp Williams, a 27-year-old San Francisco resident, said he moved to California from the South seeking equality but realized after Proposition 8 that gay people are second-class citizens everywhere.
Contrary to the California Supreme Court's decision on the legality of the referendum, he said "there is no exception to the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution."
Sara Schoonover-Martin, 34, came from Martinsburg, W.Va., with her wife, Nicki, wearing matching veils and pink T-shirts that said "bride" and "I do." The couple eloped at Martha's Vineyard in Massachusetts earlier this year.
"When marriage is legalized in West Virginia, we will renew our vows and have our family and friends there," Sara said. "I'm angry that it hasn't occurred quicker. This affects my life every day, 365 days a year."
For Lt. Dan Choi, the day began with a jog around Washington's memorials, calling cadence at 8 a.m. with fellow veterans and supporters before joining the march. Choi, a West Point graduate, Arabic speaker and Iraq war veteran, is facing discharge under the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy for revealing in March that he is gay.
"We have fought in battles to protect our country, and now we are fighting at home for equal and full protection under the law," he said. He later stood outside the White House in uniform with his partner.
On Saturday, he led a group of gay veterans in laying a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier at Arlington National Cemetery to honor gay and lesbian soldiers who have died in the line of duty.
Other veteran activists doubted the march would accomplish much. They said the time and money would have been better spent working to persuade voters in Maine and Washington state, where the November ballot will include a measure that would overturn a bill granting same-sex couples many of the benefits of marriage.
A bill introducing same-sex marriage in the nation's capital also was introduced last week by the District of Columbia Council and is expected to easily pass.
Rep. Barney Frank, an openly gay member of Congress, said the marchers should be lobbying their lawmakers. He said the demonstrations are simply "an emotional release" that do little to pressure Congress.
"The only thing they're going to be putting pressure on is the grass," the Massachusetts Democrat said Friday.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091011/ap_on_re_us/us_gay_rights_march
McQ by Alexander McQueen
I agree completely with Rep. Frank however there is nothing wrong with marching too just make sure you don't forget the actual step that is going to make a difference and that is lobbying your representatives.
1Isn't Barney Frank the rep for Vermont? Also, I'm so behind, I only found out he is gay last week! Where the heck have I been?!
Anyways, I listened to some of Obama's speech and I tried to think how I would feel if I were gay. I think I'd be happy he was saying that stuff, but I'd be pissed that there is no concrete action items or timeline (kinda how I feel as a straight person with him in regards to other topics).
2He is a rep In Mass, Haus.
3Obama got himself into this pickle by not repealing the ban first thing. That would have been the most opportune moment to do it if he ever was going to do it because one he could have got it done and it would be at least one thing in his closed and file basket. Now he's got all of this major legislation on life support and he fears that if he rocks the boat to much he's gonna flat line everything. All I have to say is good luck brother.
4I'm split. On one hand, he promised to do all this stuff, on the other, he promised to do a lot. It's understandable that he hasn't been able to do more in such a short time, but still, a promise is a promise.
5yeah, and i would think this would be one of the easier promises to keep.
6Bernie Sanders! Thats who I'm thinking of. For some reason I always get those two confused.
7Obama needs the legislation to come from Congress. Isn't "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" federal law?
8the bill is out there, its got abot 3/4th the support it needs
9First a disclaimer. Don't ask don't tell TOTALLY needs to be repealed. But, and I've said this before, it will take some time to figure out how to do it. The military doesn't house men and women together if at all possible to avoid sexual issues. If they openly accept gay men and women they have to figure out what to do housing-wise...and what do they do with bisexuals? Who will they room with? Unfortunately it is more complex than it seems. I hope that Obama and his advisors pay close attention to the countries that have done this successfully so that the transition is smooth as possible.
10But we've been talking about it here for almost two years now. They've known the end of DADT was coming and they've had plenty of time to start working out the details.
11Agreed steph. I hope there are people working on this.Somehow I don't think there are though.
12I think if they truly thought it was a great idea they would have worked out the details. I think the fact that they haven't might be more of an indication that those in the military truly don't want it to happen.
Civilians being in charge of the military is a double edged sword, sometimes it can provide a great checks and balance system, but other times it can result in an unrealistic expectation that simply just don't work.
13I don't think that we would know if they were working on the details or not.
As for things besides DADT, it really has to come from Congress. There is so much pressure on Obama, but people fail to recognize that in many instances, congress has more power than the President. He can only sign into law what they write. Plus, we don't have 60 dems in the Senate. That is a myth. We have independents who aren't even technically democrats, and we also have a LOT of "Blue Dog" dems who are essentially Republican.
IMO, If people want Obama to make progress on the issues that affect the GLBT community, they need to focus on Congress and those members that drag their feet on these issues. Especially the Senate, where states that have miniscule populations get as much power as those Senators that represent tens of millions of people.
14"But we've been talking about it here for almost two years now. They've known the end of DADT was coming and they've had plenty of time to start working out the details."
I'm confused. Do you think Bush was working on a plan to end it?
15I think we would know if they were working on it, why would they keep it under wraps? And certainly the Pres could use that to his advantage, he'd def. spill the beans.
16I think she meant here here, as in Sugar, but I could be wrong.
17Yeah, talking about it here Jill. I don't think Bush was working on ending it, but I think it's been clear for a while that it has to go. I think the WH has been talking with Congress & the DOD about ending it - but we saw what happened during the Clinton Administration when the beans were spilled too soon.
18I know President Obama said he would take care of it, but these people need to understand that he has important meetings to attend too as well, and he will get too it as soon as he can.
Marching and fussing about it in the streets daily will not rush Obama at all. The President said he would do it as President and he eventually will. He is not going to tell you where he is every moment of the day. You will never know his detailed schedule and how he's working bit by bit to get all things done.
Too many people expect Obama to do every one of his promises with the first 3 months and if he doesn't then here we go. Positive difficult change takes time....don't be so disruptive and whinny.
19This should not be first on the Presidents list. He can get to this later after the more important issues are taken care of.
20Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.