The Marin Humane Society shut down an animal rescue group's San Rafael operations and seized 19 animals for treatment after uncovering "shocking conditions" at the center.
The Milo Foundation was forced to close its adoption center and animal holding site at 2060 Fourth St. on Friday, one day after an unannounced early-morning inspection by the Marin Humane Society. The inspection uncovered health and safety violations including triple the number of dogs and cats allowed at the site, animals living in their own feces and untreated for contagious diseases and inadequate staffing or medical supervision, Humane Society officials said.
"It was overwhelming," said Capt. Cindy Machado of the Marin Humane Society. "After witnessing shocking conditions for the animals at Milo in San Rafael, we issued a directive to the Milo Foundation that operations at its San Rafael facility must stop immediately."
Machado said last week's inspection was in response to complaints of mismanagement at the San Rafael site. In July, she accompanied an inspection of the foundation's sanctuary in Willits by the Humane Society of the United States that uncovered similar animal health and safety issues of inadequate housing and lack of care. That inspection was prompted by complaints from former sanctuary staffers.
The findings resulted in Humane Society officials meeting with foundation representatives "to address long-term plans for Willits and improve conditions there," Machado said.
Lynn Tingle, Milo's executive director, disputed the allegations, although she acknowledged the San Rafael center had more dogs on hand than its city permit allowed. She said the foundation was in the process of requesting the city to update its permit to allow an additional 10 dogs on site.
"I disagree with their findings," said Tingle, of Berkeley. "I just think there's a big difference between animal control and animal rescue. We're about saving lives. We're going to fight this."
Machado said there were about 30 dogs and 20 cats at the site on Thursday. The use permit issued by the city of San Rafael allowed for 10 dogs and 25 cats, she said.
The city of San Rafael has no record of complaints regarding the site and no application on file from the foundation to amend its use permit, said city spokeswoman Terri Hardesty.
She said the decision to issue or amend a permit requires review by the county public health department and the Marin Humane Society. Those agencies have authority to shut down the business if unsafe conditions are found, she said.
"We have to follow their lead," Hardesty said.
Machado said in addition to the strong smell of urine and excrement upon their arrival Thursday, inspectors found animals - some of which were in the process of being adopted - suffering from diseases including ringworm.
"It was a breeding ground for massive problems of animals with diseases and no vet care," Machado said. "They don't have any disease control measures that prevent diseases from passing through animal populations. It was just a time bomb waiting to happen."
Tingle countered claims of a lack of medical expertise, noting the foundation's veterinarian bills are about $10,000 a month. Veterinary paperwork was provided to the Humane Society, she said.
The center's five-person staff including a veterinarian technician and four animal care staffers as well as a dozen volunteers, Tingle said.
"As yet we don't have a veterinarian on our staff, but we have very established long-term relationships with vets in the Bay Area and Mendocino County," Tingle said.
The San Rafael center opened in 2008 in a building that used to house a veterinary hospital. The nonprofit foundation was created in 1994 to provide homes for unwanted pets.
Machado said the agency was working with Milo to make arrangements for its animals and provide treatment for those with serious health issues. The San Rafael center needed a "deep and thorough cleaning," she said.
In January 2007, Milo shut down its pet adoption center on Solano Avenue in Berkeley over neighborhood complaints that included excessive barking, excrement on the sidewalk and a pervasive smell of urine.
Machado said her agency was committed to helping Milo develop a plan "to prevent these issues from ever happening again."
Hardesty said if Milo did violate the terms of its use permit, the foundation may have to plead its case before the Planning Commission in order to retain it.
"There's going to be conversations between all agencies and the city," she said. "The next step will be to see if that makes sense to have a hearing on revocation."
Stila
It sounds like their problems aren't all new, but I would imagine these days it's easy for a shelter to be overwhelmed by need for its services but without anywhere near the money to keep up.
1It's so sad when an organization starts out with the best intentions of saving these pets, but end up harming them.
2It really is sad. It's also a reminder of how much responsibility goes into being a pet owner. It irks me when I visit a shelter and see "Not enough time for pet" or "Too much to handle" on the dogs' cages. A little research into what kind of dog to get (and really serious examination of your own schedule) goes a long way.
3That is so sad.
Em, people really don't do their research. I cringe every time I hear people say, "I live in an apartment, so I just want a small dog like a Jack Russell."
So stupid. Many small dogs are extremely high energy. A Great Dane makes for a better apartment dog.
4"A Great Dane makes for a better apartment dog."
Yup. Exactly. I see tons of terriers at the shelter near my work. It's sad seeing them in particular all cooped up.
5I think shelters could do a better job trying to match the pet to a suitable owner.
6I agree, Sarah! Makes me appreciate the shelter where we got our dog. It is huge and beautiful, and they make you fill out a huge questionnaire and then meet with a counselor. Like, we were looking at a black lab, and he was like, okay, how much do you know about labs?
We ended up not getting that lab because they knew he was good at getting over fences and the one side of our fence was kind of low, not because we didn't know about the breed, but I was overall so impressed.
7Exactly. Sometimes the dog you think is the cutest, is not your perfectly matched dog. And the shelter is doing a disservice if they allow you to take the wrong dog, that'll eventually end up back at the shelter when you realize you can't handle it.
8Agreed! We ended up with the third dog on our list after talking it through. And we ended up with basically the best dog in the world.
9That's a good shelter!
When they know the dogs (and cats) well enough to determine
which one would be a good match for you.
10I completely agree about research before getting a pet. My sister is wanting to get a dog now... her research? Based on cuteness. I keep trying to get her to understand that some dogs are high maintenance... others are not good for apartment living, etc. It just doesn't sink in.
11Ugh.
12Wow, how terrible for all these animals that had to endure that type of care.
13Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.