Children with older fathers have a significantly increased risk of having autism, a study has concluded.
The UK and US researchers examined data on 132,271 children and said those born to men over 40 were six times more at risk than those born to men under 30.
They said the study in Archives of General Psychiatry was further proof men also had "biological clocks".
One UK expert said the study could be important in understanding the genetic mechanisms underlying autism.
Autism and related conditions, known as autism spectrum disorders, have become increasingly common, affecting 50 in every 10,000 children as compared with five in 10,000 two decades ago.
Increased awareness and changes in the way the disorders are diagnosed are thought to play a major role in the increase, but the researchers say it may also be linked to other changing factors.
Older parental age has previously been linked to abnormalities in the brain development of children.
Genetic fault
The researchers, from Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, and the Institute of Psychiatry at King's College London, looked at data on 132,271 children born in Israel during the 1980s.
All men, and three-quarters of women born in these years were assessed by the draft board at age 17, during which time any disorders were recorded.
The board also took information on the ages of their father and mother, and took into account factors such as year of birth and socioeconomic status.
Among those whose fathers were between 15 and 29 when they were born, the rate of autism was six in every 10,000, rising to nine in every 10,000 when fathers were aged 30 to 39 (1.6 times higher).
In the group whose fathers were aged 40 to 49, the rate rose to 32 in 10,000 (5.75 times higher).
The rate appeared to be even higher when fathers were aged over 50, but the researchers said the sample size was very small.
The mother's age did not appear to influence the chances a child would have autism.
The researchers suggest there may be a genetic fault which is more common with age.
This might be spontaneous mutations in sperm-producing cells or alterations in genetic "imprinting," which affects gene expression.
'Convincing evidence'
The team, led by Dr Avi Reichenberg from the IoP, said: "It is important to keep in mind that age at paternity is influenced by the socio-cultural environment and varies across societies and over time.
"In a given population, a change in the socio-cultural environment could produce a change in paternal age at birth.
"In theory, it could thereby lead to a change in the incidence of genetic causes of autism."
He added: "Although further work is necessary to confirm this interpretation, we believe that our study provides the first convincing evidence that advanced paternal age is a risk factor for autism spectrum disorder."
Professor Simon Baron Cohen, of the Autism Research Centre in Cambridge, said: "The finding of a significant association with advancing paternal age is one that should be straightforward to test in other samples, to see if this result from a purely Israeli sample generalises to other populations.
"If confirmed, it could have important implications for the genetic mechanisms underlying autism."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5313874.stm
sweatyBetty
Well! Good to know women aren't the only ones with biological clocks.
1Do you think vaccine haters will advocate for a ban on elder fathers too?
2There are so many possibilities, it's a wonder any of us got here.
3I think more studies need to be done about autism. People are putting children at terrible risk.
4That is, if you believe vaccines cause autism, foreigngirl.
5Oh no I think they dont but people are putting their kids at risk by not having them vaccinated.
6I just signed up is my photo too big on my avatar?
7Oooooooooooh I gotcha.
Nope looks fine!
8Thanks Much! nice site
9I think the increase in autism, has a lot to do with changes in identifying autism. In the early 1960's about he only book you could find dealing with autism was “Wednesdays Child” by Bruno Bettelheim. At that time only the most extreme cases were correctly identified as being “autism”, think “Rainman”.
10I just read an article about the initial MMR study...which has been discovered to be a flawed and unrepeatable study. I think Dateline did a show about it a few days ago. It's a long article, but very interesting at showing the hysteria it caused.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683643.ec...
11Too many kids born to older fathers for decades with no massive autism rise yet when the MMR vaccine was introduced vs. the vaccines being given separately there was a noted rise. These shots were combined to save time and money.
12You know what's crazy though Sam? The initial MMR study by Wakefield was done on 12 children. This study was done on over 100,000. If we're going to believe one study over the other, how is a study based on the symptoms of 12 children (which has never been replicated) considered a reputable study?
I agree that separate, individual shots are a better idea. Having worked in the veterinary vaccine world, and treating those kinds of reactions, I think a delayed vaccine schedule is probably better.
13"Some used statistics to see if autism took off in 1988, when MMR was introduced. It did not. Others used virology to see if MMR caused bowel disease, a core suggestion in the paper. It did not. Yet more replicated the exact Wakefield tests. They showed nothing like what he said."
14"I think the increase in autism, has a lot to do with changes in identifying autism. "
I agree, Grandpa.
15I think they over identify and have expanded the definition of autism. I am not going by studies but by the amount of cases that have been reported. clusters across europe that are showing up with a common denominator - post MMR. To save a few bucks and some time they are putting children at risk. Polio vaccine, Measles, Rubella are the ones we grew up with being placed over time. I never received the mumps or chicken pox vaccine - everyone was exposed to CP and we all got it at the same time (before the parties were fashionable). A lot of kids were like me they actually developed a minor case of what the shot was and developed a good immunity. Imagine the body getting it all at once - which does it work on first and can it defeat them successfully or do you damage the host.
16Sam, I agree with you 100% about chicken pox.
17Me too! I never got that shot either. I think it's totally unnecessary actually.
18I got the cp shot, but still got cp in middle school.
How does that happen??
19Martini did you get it soon after being vaccinated?
It's an attenuated vaccine, meaning it contains a live, weakened strain of the Varicella zoster virus. So sometimes it's still possible to get a mild case of Chicken Pox.
20No, I was vaccinated as a small child (kindergarten, I think)....then I got it in 8th grade...
21
Hmm. Then I dunno!
22Weird, isn't it??? Maybe I got a crappy batch of the vaccine???
23Nah...I'm thinking the weakened virus was dormant in your system. And then you were exposed at a later age, which caused the full blown case. Was it a bad infection?
24There has been a correlation of an increase in "break through" CP post vaccination by those who also did not receive the small pox vaccine.
They quit giving small pox vaccines to civilians years ago. I had to take my kids to a military base to get it.
As a veteran I was given a second small pox vaccine when I enlisted in 1980.
Military gives booster CP vaccines if there has been a lapse of 5-10 years post first vaccine and no active event.
25Smallpox has been globally eradicated for 30 years. So it shouldn't be a surprise that the vaccine isn't given to civilians anymore.
26And if there ever is an outbreak of smallpox, I believe there's enough vaccine available for everyone in the U.S.
27But none of that really has anything to do with autism and old dads.
28I think my oldest son was one of the last children to get that small pox vaccination in the U.S.
29I agree with Grandpa that it is a better understanding of the disease that has led to an increase in cases. The problem with saying its vaccinations is that there are hundreds of thousands who don't vaccinate and are still autistic. And the MMR shot is given at 18 months, right around the time that if you were autistic the signs would start to appear anyway.
There are too many serious disease that could make a come back that to not vaccinate seems more risky. I believe the best thing to do is have your child get them on a staggered schedule or only get the ones that protect against the most serious diseases.
30I personally believe that the autism rate has gone up in the US since the introduction of synthetic hormones (pitocen, etc) to mothers in childbirth.
http://www.autismtoday.com/articles/ATTN_Researchers.htm
31i agree with GP. i still think that one of the main reasons we're seeing more cases of autism is because more people are being diagnosed. obvious, yes, but i really think that years ago, an autistic child would be labeled as something else. the diagnosis has changed.
i do like the idea of splitting up the vaccinations though. i don't believe that vaccinations cause autism, but i don't really like the idea of all that cr@p being injected into your body at the same time. that can't be good for the immune system.
32There have been small pox break outs around the world. We are seeing an increase of eradicated illness here from immigrants who come in unvaccinated. There was talk of bringing some of the old vaccines back.
Cat that and giving them to the food chain. I make it a point to buy stuff marked as no hormones or antibiotics given. Its one of the reason I gave up cow. They don't belong there and we are just contaminating our water sources and ourselves.
33Sam, I am not sure you are right about the small pox. The last case I heard of was in Somalia in 1977. The U.S. had it's last case in 1949.
34Grandpa is right. Smallpox has been globally eradicated for 30 years.
35And if immigrants are bringing in diseases, shouldn't that be an argument for continuing to vaccinate our children?
36we had a few cases here in the city as well as measles.
on the old diseases like measles, rubella, polio yes continue but no time /money saving group shots. we need to bring back some of the ellis island tactics - no vaccine - quarantine.
here we get so many from all over that we are seeing a rise in thing we eradicated and pretty much had under control - bed bugs for one (eeew). The city subway is a great breeding ground of germs, thousands of people breathing on each other.
37Just an FYI:
The last case of smallpox was in 1978 which is why the military still vaccinate all active duty and reserves.
It was been documented the smallpox will probablt be one of the first biological/chemical warfare agent that may be used by other countries as it is easily available.
For more information:
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/vis/downloads/vis-spox.pdf
38Because we travel a lot as a family we have all been vaccinated. It is interesting to note that the CDC guide at the link above states one vaccine does not protect you for life.
39weird -it made the news here - maybe it was they came into the country with it
40Autism...
I do believe they are "lumping" many into that category simply because it has such a large base of symptoms and varied extremes. Misdiagnosis is a big concern as it eliminates some investigation in techniques which could make a remarkable difference in quality of life.
My nephew was absolutely normal until his MMR...the change was SO astounding I refused to allow my pediatrician to vaccinate my son with the "one shot wonder" and instead spread individual inoculations over a period of time.
The pediatricians I worked with "suddenly" changed how they did vaccines and would not explain why to their staff...in fact staff was discouraged from even asking about it.
If there was not correlation, or even a suspected one then there would not have been such secrecy. When physicians change actual policy there is always a REAL reason. I do not think it had anything to do with legal issues, in fact changing policy without explanation seems suspicious.
41The CDC does not publicize infection data unless it is deemed an urgent need, meaning threatened safety. They do not consider a couple cases as "threatening" and cause for alarm.
ALthough I am not an alarmist...I felt that since I worked in healthcare and that we travel a lot...then 9-11...we all went to the nearest military base for vaccines.
42Sam I searched a number of different ways, even "smallpox cases in NYC" and was unable to come up with anything. It would've been news if it was an actual smallpox infection, because the only "living" samples of the virus are contained in the U.S. and the Soviet Union (I think).
I did find a docudrama called "Smallpox 2002" where a guy got some of the virus and touched people all over NYC.
43EFF YOU BOLD!
44Supposed to say "it would've been HUGE news....
45The CDC does not publicize infection data unless it is deemed an urgent need, meaning threatened safety. They do not consider a couple cases as "threatening" and cause for alarm.
Cheeky...the CDC does publicize infection data.
46it was just a case or two that showed up - not a film (which sounds like it came from sci-fi) or an outbreak. weird things make the news here: crime, stupid crooks, stupid people, weird diseases showing up & if there are any vaccines left for it and how it could spread -they like to mention that the sanitation dept will take over the city in case of outbreak. It just stuck in my head.
47Well if you can find information I'd love to read it!
48if I can I will try and forward it to you but there is almost no way to find something that is over 3 years old short of raiding the NYC health dept files and that could take more then 3 years just on that.
49Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.