By ALEXA OLESEN – 2 hours ago
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h66J1UYJfa_TQrfb48nfeC...
BEIJING (AP) — The brawl between Han Chinese and Uighurs in southern China was scarcely covered by state media, but accounts and photos spread quickly via the Internet and became a spark that helped ignite deadly riots thousands of miles away in the Uighur homeland.
Even in tightly controlled China, relatively unfettered commentaries and images circulating on Web sites helped stir up tensions and rally people to join an initially peaceful protest in the Xinjiang region that spiraled into violence Sunday, leaving more than 150 people dead.
In China, as in Iran and other hotspots, the Internet, social networking and micro-blogging are playing a central role in mobilizing people power — and becoming contested ground as governments fight back .
In the Internet age, events in "places like Xinjiang or Tibet, which were always considered very remote," can suddenly become close and immediate for people around the world, said Xiao Qiang, director of the Berkeley China Internet Project at the University of California-Berkeley.
Since the outburst in the Xinjiang capital of Urumqi, the Chinese government has blocked Twitter and Facebook, scrubbed news sites, unplugged the Internet entirely in some places and slowed it and cell phone service to a crawl in others to stifle reports about the violence — and get its own message out that authorities are in control.
Key-word filters have been activated on search engines like Baidu and Google's Chinese version so that searches for "Xinjiang" or "Uighur" only turn up results that jibe with the official version of events.
That a fight in one part of China could impact a riot 10 days later thousands of miles away underscores how slippery fast-evolving communication technologies can be even for an authoritarian government with the world's most extensive Internet monitoring system.
State media reports said only two people died in the June 25 fight between Uighur and Han Chinese workers at a toy factory in southern Shaoguan city. In the days that followed, however, graphic photos spread on the Internet purportedly showing at least a half-dozen bodies of Uighurs, with Han Chinese — members of China's majority ethnic group — standing over them, arms raised in victory.
Expunged from some sites, the photos were posted and reposted, some on overseas servers beyond the reach of censors. Their impact was amplified by postings on bulletin boards and other sites.
Uighurbiz.cn, a site popular among Uighurs, carried an open letter over the weekend suggesting there would be revenge for the factory fight. "You've beaten Uighurs, killed Uighurs and perhaps never thought about the consequences," said the letter posted by someone using the Uighur alias Yadkar.
A flurry of postings on another popular site, Diyarim.com, began calling for action in Urumqi. Diyarim's founder, Dilixati, remembers one: "Gather at 5 p.m. at People's Square. Young people if you have time come to the square." The messages kept reappearing, and he called police to alert them and took the site off-line, said Dilixati, who would give only his first name for fear of reprisals.
Hours after Sunday's riot, when police were still trying to pacify Urumqi's streets, Xinjiang's leaders went on TV to denounce Uighur separatists living abroad for using Diyarim and Uighurbiz to organize the disturbance.
That the riot occurred in Urumqi may be testament to its being the most-wired place in Xinjiang, a remote region of vast deserts and towering mountains that juts into Central Asia.
Mobile phone coverage is typically stable in the city and people use handheld devices to go online, said Dru Gladney, a Uighur expert at the Pacific Basin Institute at Pomona College in California. In Urumqi, "people have these technologies literally at their fingertips," he said.
Elsewhere in Xinjiang, the best services are provided at closely monitored Internet cafes, where Uighurs may be less comfortable posting sensitive information, Gladney said.
Only a dozen years ago, when China was scarcely wired, details of the authorities' brutal quelling of a similar protest by Uighurs in the city of Yining leaked out slowly and even today remain obscure. An official death toll of nine is disputed by exiled Uighurs and rights groups who say fatalities may have been 10 times that or greater.
Unplugging Internet and cell phone service has become standard practice for dealing with civil unrest. The government did so in March over worries about renewed anti-Chinese demonstrations in Tibetan areas.
Though officials usually prefer to keep silent about such tactics, Urumqi's top Communist Party official, Li Zhi, told a news conference Tuesday that the Internet was deliberately cut off in parts of the city. He said it was done "in order to quench the riot quickly and prevent violence from spreading to other places."
Such censorship does not quiet unrest for long, but instead ends up giving rumors more credence than they deserve, said Berkeley's Xiao.
"The more you try to police the Internet, and delete information, the more those rumors become some kind of truth and people just pick what they want to believe," said Xiao. "That's the negative direct consequences of such tight information control."
Copyright © 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
French Connection
Achile
Diane von Furstenberg
Dictatorships just aren't the same anymore...
1I know it's not AS glamour as Michael Jackson being dead for 10 days, but still : I think that the Internet revolution has changed everything for democracy :
In places where you have democracy, the Internet has become this sort of big chaos in which everyone speaks at the same time and never really listens to each other...
But in places where you have to fight for democracy, the Internet suddenly becomes this wonderful tool that you can use against the authoritarian powers...
2It has changed a lot - it's definitely harder to hide what's going on.
3It's hard though, to determine what actually IS going on, since for most of the outside world, this is the first time we're hearing of some of these conflicts or of these people. You want to be there for people who are struggling, but it's frustrating to be so unable to help them, beyond calling your Congressperson or the White House. I think human rights groups are going to have to become more Internet savvy and more networked among themselves in order to ensure that legitimate calls for help and attention don't get lost in the noise - we know governments are working on ways to scramble and compromise messages.
Apparently, Arlen Spector anticipated whiners like me. He has an article on the Huffington Post about how we can help people get information out:
"First of all, American companies that have abetted repressive regimes in censoring information must reexamine their relationships and ways of doing business. At a minimum, they should stop providing products or services that will be used to restrict information. Above all, they must refrain from turning cyber dissidents over to governments. If companies fail to take these steps, Congress is likely to mandate them.
Secondly, the government in its approach to cyber warfare must elevate efforts to promote Internet access into a more active tool of foreign policy. Congress recognized this when it declared that "ensuring the freedom of Internet communications in dictatorships and autocracies throughout the world is a high and critical national interest priority of the United States." The Iranian crisis and China's efforts to "purify" the Internet have lent urgency to the cause.
Third, Congress needs to make sure that funds to promote Internet freedom go to organizations with proven track records in enabling large numbers of users to breach the most sophisticated and repressive Internet firewalls operated by closed society regimes. In the past two years Congress has spent $20 million on Internet access. A bill I am sponsoring would raise that to $50 million in the new fiscal year.
A number of organizations have developed software that can be used to bypass the most sophisticated Internet restrictions. The most prominent is the Global Internet Freedom Consortium, creators of the software used by Iranians to communicate both internally and with the outside world during the election crisis. The Consortium also developed ways around China's efforts to censor the Internet, neutralizing its so-called "Golden Shield" and "Green Dam" barriers.
Another non-profit group of anti-censorship activists offers free software to send messages secretly or to reach blocked Web sites. A third program, developed by political scientists at the University of Toronto, allows anyone to evade Internet firewalls using a Web browser."
4I have students which are living in many of these places of unrest. Our online classes are affected as we must censor ourselves in our conversations so that they can be allowed to complete their classes.
One student yesterday posted a note which when we de-coded it, simply said that a bus of children were blown up yesterday when authorities in China physically blew up transformers in hopes to prevent the availability of the internet there. The bus just happened to be in the wrong place-wrong time.
When they have to resort to actually "coding" a message in order to turn in an assignment it makes you wonder what other lengths these people must go thru just to get what we all take for granted every day. Simple freedom.
5My gosh, Cheeky, that's horrible! There simply isn't words to express it.
6Yes it is. It is beyond comprehension. The Internet has been a huge equalizer across the planet...and unfortunately it is impossible to control. Communists, dictators, and backwards thinking leaders will go to great lengths to prevent the Internet from relaying the atrocities they force upon people, but it also means it is going to get much harder for them the get away with it.
7Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.