The New York Times editorial page Wednesday suggested President Barack Obama should find a way to temporarily suspend discharges of gay and lesbian soldiers.
"President Obama should see if there is indeed any action he could take on his own while awaiting the military’s assessment," the Times concludes. "In the end, it will be up to Congress to root out 'don’t ask, don’t tell' by overturning the law that brought it about."
The editorial notes that thousands of gay military personnel, including highly skilled interpreters and intelligence analysts, have been discharged under the military's gay ban, known as "don't ask, don't tell," at a time when the Armed Forces are stretched especially thin.
"Advocates for gay soldiers believe that the administration, on its own, has the authority to prevent the discharge of gay people, perhaps by issuing “stop-loss” orders such as those used to keep troops serving past their original commitments in Iraq — many unwillingly," writes the Times. "How much better to use the power to prevent the loss of gay service members eager to keep serving."
The piece also says that although Obama said he would overturn the ban during the campaign, "has made no move beyond asking the Pentagon to assess the implications."
http://www.advocate.com/news_detail_ektid89315.asp
NYT editorial: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/10/opinion/10wed2.html?_r=3&ref=opinion
ras
French Connection
Diesel
I think Obama should take a stand and overturn "don't ask Don't tell" I think he is a coward for not taking on the issue and leaving people to manipulate the current system to allow gays to serve. It is very sad!
1I just don't understand what the big deal is. Obviously, these people are talented in their fields and provide a huge contribution to our society by serving in the Armed Forces. But somehow, since they are (GASP!) gay, they don't deserve to continue in their jobs? This policy is insane and should be repealed ASAP!
2Thanks Clinton for a crappy ass policy
3If they are now allowing women to serve in combat operations, they might as well remove the DADT policy. It doesn't make any sense to have one, and not the other.
4I think this is an interesting idea, my only concern is that some people who are desperate to get out will claim to be gay so they get discharged, if they can't do that, I would assume they would take more serious measures... so that is troubling to me.
5hausfrau, won't work according to hypno. Gays have "Gay-dar".
He stopped the military tribunals at GITMO pending his review, thee moment he came into office. If he was being honest with the gay community he would have done the same thing here.
6Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.