CONCORD, N.H. (AP) - New Hampshire became the sixth state to legalize gay marriage Wednesday in a move that reflects the state's changing demographics from reliably Republican and conservative to younger and more liberal.
The Senate and House passed key language on religious rights, Gov. John Lynch - who personally opposes gay marriage - signed the legislation Wednesday afternoon.
Lynch, a Democrat, had promised a veto if the law didn't clearly spell out that churches and religious groups would not be forced to officiate at gay marriages or provide other services. Legislators made the changes.
"Today, we are standing up for the liberties of same-sex couples by making clear that they will receive the same rights, responsibilities - and respect - under New Hampshire law," Lynch said.
Massachusetts, Connecticut, Maine, Vermont and Iowa already allow gay marriage, though opponents hope to overturn Maine's law with a public vote.
California briefly allowed gay marriage before a public vote banned it; a court ruling grandfathered in couples who were already married.
Lynch said it is now time for the federal government to extend full equal rights to same-sex couples.
After rallies outside the Statehouse by both sides in the morning, the last of three bills in the package went to the Senate, which approved it 14-10 Wednesday afternoon.
Cheers from the gallery greeted the key vote in the House, which passed it 198-176. Surrounded by gay marriage supporters, Lynch signed the bill about an hour later.
The New Hampshire law will take effect Jan. 1, exactly two years after the state began recognizing civil unions.
The Rt. Rev. V. Gene Robinson, elected in New Hampshire in 2003 as the first openly gay bishop in the Episcopal Church, was among those celebrating the new law.
"It's about being recognized as whole people and whole citizens," Robinson said.
"There are a lot of people standing here who when we grew up could not have imagined this," he said. "You can't imagine something that is simply impossible. It's happened, in our lifetimes."
Opponents objected on grounds including the fragmented process.
"It is no surprise that the Legislature finally passed the last piece to the gay marriage bill today. After all, when you take 12 votes on five iterations of the same issue, you're bound to get it passed sooner or later," said Kevin Smith, executive director of gay marriage opponent Cornerstone Policy Research.
The revised bill clarified that church-related organizations that serve charitable or educational purposes are exempt from having to provide insurance and other benefits to same-sex spouses of employees.
The House rejected the language Lynch suggested two weeks ago by two votes. Wednesday's vote was on a revised bill negotiated with the Senate.
"The pro-gay marriage people have been very disingenuous," said Fenton Groen, 59, of Rochester, N.H. "They told us two years ago that if civil unions were passed, that would completely satisfy them. Within two years, they have completely changed their minds."
Supporters had considered Wednesday their last chance to pass a bill this year.
Rob Davis of Concord and his partner of 27 years, Dean Davis, were in the jubilant crowd outside afterward.
They had a civil union last year.
"It didn't go far enough," Rob Davis said of their civil union. "We're real happy."
New Hampshire's decision leaves Rhode Island as the only New England state not to allow same-sex marriages. A bill there is expected to fail this year, as similar ones have in previous years.
http://m.apnews.com/ap/db_7731/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=omulwReN
Karen Millen
"Opponents objected on grounds including the fragmented process."
Seriously? It strikes me that a lot of opponents to gay marriage seem uncomfortable saying, "I don't think gay people should be allowed to get married." It's always, "Marriage should be between a man and a woman," or even more obtuse "I just don't want activist judges deciding for everyone." The "fragmented process"? Seriously?
1Also, I think it's all fine that they specify that churches won't have to do gay weddings (silly that they feel the need to since I, for example, can't get married in a Mormon or Catholic church, but good to put to rest one of the scare tactics), but it's interesting that churches won't have to provide benefits to a same sex spouse of an employee.
I wonder, if I start an atheist organization, can I refuse to give benefits to anyone who got married in a church?
2" I think it's all fine that they specify that churches won't have to do gay weddings (silly that they feel the need to since I, for example, can't get married in a Mormon or Catholic church, but good to put to rest one of the scare tactics), but it's interesting that churches won't have to provide benefits to a same sex spouse of an employee."
Agreed, TS.
3"The pro-gay marriage people have been very disingenuous," said Fenton Groen, 59, of Rochester, N.H. "They told us two years ago that if civil unions were passed, that would completely satisfy them. Within two years, they have completely changed their minds."
"They told us that...... " I am so sure that every single one of those pro-gay marriage
people agreed that they'd be satisfied.
4This is wonderful! Naysayers are just going to have to get over it. It's GOING to happen everywhere. All they can do is make it difficult for us. But we will prevail.
5Actually True Song you can get married in a Catholic Church as long as one of you is a Catholic. My own parents were married in a Catholic Church some 75+ years ago. At that time you couldn't have mass as part of the ceremony, but that has changed.
6" After all, when you take 12 votes on five iterations of the same issue, you're bound to get it passed sooner or later," said Kevin Smith," Hey Kevin, then you have 7+ months to drum up support to repeal that law.
7Grandpa, my point is that neither I nor my partner are Catholic, and the church has every legal right (and good reason) to refuse to perform a wedding ceremony for me.
So I get mad when anti-gay marriage groups try to say that churches will be sued for not performing gay marriages. Churches are well within their rights to refuse to marry someone who doesn't subscribe to their religion.
8TrueSong, don't be too sure about that. I believe that Connecticut is going after the Catholic Church, for preaching against a law supporting gay marriage. (The preaching was from the pulpit).
9Grandpa, Connecticut isn't "going after" the Catholic church. Connecticut passed Bill 1098 which basically says that if a church is going to organize its members to lobby the government, it needs to register as a lobbyist group.
And besides that, it still doesn't change the fact that I cannot get married in a Catholic church. I'm really pretty sure about this one. In fact, a friend of mine recently married and was denied access to the church she wanted because she wasn't "Catholic enough," she had stopped going to mass a few years prior.
Churches are already allowed to deny a couple the use of their church and officiant for pretty much any reason.
10Great news!!!
11"not catholic enough"
Good thing I got married when i did.
12Yeah, I think with the Catholic Church it really depends on the actual parish.
Anyway,
. Hopefully more states will follow suit soon.
13This is all fantastic and dandy but I agree with what I heard yesterday. Once we get one Southern State to do this that will be the true tipping point. If that happens IMO we can just sit back and enjoy the ride (at least those that are in favor of it).
14Do any southern states look like they're considering this? Think they'll be told they are no longer southern if they do?
15"Think they'll be told they are no longer southern if they do?"
I dont get this? explain.
16It means How strongly do the other southern states feel about gay marriage?
17I will very surprised to see any of the Southern states take the initiative to legalize same sex marriage. I'm not saying it's not possible, just that I will be very surprised.
18Good for NH. Im not too surprised about RI. Although they have a gay Mayor, it is still a very catholic state.
19well since Florida just voted No on gay marriage i dont see it turning anytime soon.
20Well as far as Southern States go it’s bound to happen sooner or later and the ones that will fold first IMO will be Florida, Georgia and Virginia. Florida will probably be the first since it hosts the largest out and Gay community in the South.
21LOL...caterpillergirl.
Yes they did but tides have a way of rolling in and out.
22well it won by 62% to keep it between a man and a woman, so maybe thats not such a far stretch to think that it wont change.
23I wonder if that could have anything to do with the large Hispanic population?
24It takes time to get people to change sincerely held beliefs, whether the beliefs are right or wrong. Once the general public notice that those states that allow gay marriage, have not collapsed into a pit of depravity, or societal collapse, attitudes will change. It happened with race based laws, interracial marriage, etc. It will happen with "gay marriage" as well, it is inevitable.
25Yes Hispanic Catholic and Evangelical communities in general. Thing is the Gay (out)community is pretty large there for a Southern state which hosts such strong faith beliefs. Probably later than sooner but as that community grows and becomes more mainstream with in the State we'll see thos % points move in the other direction.
26Well, prop 22 passed in California with a 22% margin in 2000, but prop 8 only passed with 4%, so it can change relatively quickly.
27Speaking of I need to make reservations to go see my boys in Miami
28Besides religious groups, another demographic to consider in Florida is that there's just a lotta old people, and the older you are, the less likely you are to be in favor of gay marriage. So as older voters die, my guess is public opinion will numerically swing rather quickly.
29hmmm...Miami, huh!?! I've heard Miami is good for two things "gettin' it up" and "gettin' it in"...
sorry, I couldn't help myself
30I cant stand miami myself. I would rather vacation in he11.
31"So as older voters die" Thanks for reminding me TS
32Aw, Grandpa... she didn't mean you, of course.
WTG New Hampshire.
Live free or die, mofos, like I always say.
33Haha! tiabia I won't confirm that for fear of getting flagged.
34Grandpa, I was under the impression you were really quite a young man?
35Are you kidding TrueSong...Grandpa has a cloth napkin he stole from restaurant where T. Roosevelt was dinning
;)
36Hypno, I even have the receipted bill from the last supper, autographed by all the participants. I got that as opposed to my regular tip, when I was "bussing" that meal.
37
This is excellent news!
38Were you Mary Magdalene's pimp Grandpa
39Hey, Mary was just a generous young lady, don't besmirch her reputation like that. Besides she did not want to lose her armature status by accepting cash.
40Haha!
41" I've heard Miami is good for two things "gettin' it up" and "gettin' it in"..."
tia!
42Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.